Re: Finding all branches(remote and local) include given commit?

["Carlos Martín Nieto" <cmn@elego.de>]

On Sat, 2012-05-12 at 21:25 +0900, Yi, EungJun wrote:
> Wow, I should do like this:
> 
> $ git branch -a --contains 499e7b31509cfbb59dcb2a046f8e2fd1a3e73d6f
> * master
>   remotes/origin/HEAD -> origin/master
>   remotes/origin/master
>   remotes/origin/next
>   remotes/origin/pu
> 
> git-branch has '-a' but not '-all', and git-remote has '--all' but not '-a'.

The branch command has had long-form since 1.7.8

> 
> This is a bit confusing for me. Why don't the two commands have the
> option under the same name?
> 
> 
> 2012/5/12 Carlos Martín Nieto <cmn@elego.de>:
> > On Sat, 2012-05-12 at 20:42 +0900, Yi, EungJun wrote:
> >> Is there any way to find remote and local branches include given commit?
> >>
> >> e.g.
> >>
> >> $ git branch --all --contains 499e7b31509cfbb59dcb2a046f8e2fd1a3e73d6f
> >> * master
> >>   remotes/origin/next
> >>
> >> As you know, it does not work and "git branch --contains" finds only
> >> local branches.
> >
> > Works For Me. What version are you trying it with? Are you sure that
> > remote-tracking branches do contain that commit?
> >
> > From a quick look through the log and release notes, it was never
> > mentioned as a fix. The log contains 3f7701a4 from 2007 which fixes 'git
> > describe --all --contains' which, though unlikely, might be related.
> > This commit was however part of release 1.5.4, which makes it unlikely
> > you'd be using something older.
> >
> >   cmn
> >
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>