From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Adam Spiers Subject: [PATCH v3 5/6] Test the test framework more thoroughly Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 19:49:50 +0100 Message-ID: <1348080591-16430-2-git-send-email-git@adamspiers.org> References: <20120919184406.GC19246@atlantic.linksys.moosehall> <1348080591-16430-1-git-send-email-git@adamspiers.org> Cc: Junio C Hamano , Jeff King To: git list X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Sep 19 20:50:05 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TEPLX-0000ht-LE for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 20:50:04 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756879Ab2ISSt4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Sep 2012 14:49:56 -0400 Received: from coral.adamspiers.org ([85.119.82.20]:45039 "EHLO coral.adamspiers.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756872Ab2ISSty (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Sep 2012 14:49:54 -0400 Received: from localhost (f.8.b.2.1.5.e.f.f.f.4.f.0.4.2.0.0.0.0.0.b.1.4.6.0.b.8.0.1.0.0.2.ip6.arpa [IPv6:2001:8b0:641b:0:240:f4ff:fe51:2b8f]) by coral.adamspiers.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 91A732E5DE; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 19:49:53 +0100 (BST) X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.12.147.g6d168f4 In-Reply-To: <1348080591-16430-1-git-send-email-git@adamspiers.org> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Add 5 new full test suite runs each with a different number of passing/failing/broken/fixed tests, in order to ensure that the correct exit code and output are generated in each case. As before, these are run in a subdirectory in order to disrupt the metrics for the parent tests. Signed-off-by: Adam Spiers --- t/t0000-basic.sh | 104 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 104 insertions(+) diff --git a/t/t0000-basic.sh b/t/t0000-basic.sh index 029e3bd..65f578f 100755 --- a/t/t0000-basic.sh +++ b/t/t0000-basic.sh @@ -85,6 +85,55 @@ check_sub_test_lib_test () { test_cmp expect out) } +test_expect_success 'pretend we have a fully passing test suite' " + run_sub_test_lib_test full-pass '3 passing tests' <<-\\EOF && + for i in 1 2 3; do + test_expect_success \"passing test #\$i\" 'true' + done + test_done + EOF + check_sub_test_lib_test full-pass <<-\\EOF + > ok 1 - passing test #1 + > ok 2 - passing test #2 + > ok 3 - passing test #3 + > # passed all 3 test(s) + > 1..3 + EOF +" + +test_expect_success 'pretend we have a partially passing test suite' " + test_must_fail run_sub_test_lib_test \ + partial-pass '2/3 tests passing' <<-\\EOF && + test_expect_success 'passing test #1' 'true' + test_expect_success 'failing test #2' 'false' + test_expect_success 'passing test #3' 'true' + test_done + EOF + check_sub_test_lib_test partial-pass <<-\\EOF + > ok 1 - passing test #1 + > not ok 2 - failing test #2 + # false + > ok 3 - passing test #3 + > # failed 1 among 3 test(s) + > 1..3 + EOF +" + +test_expect_success 'pretend we have a known breakage' " + run_sub_test_lib_test failing-todo 'A failing TODO test' <<-\\EOF && + test_expect_success 'passing test' 'true' + test_expect_failure 'pretend we have a known breakage' 'false' + test_done + EOF + check_sub_test_lib_test failing-todo <<-\\EOF + > ok 1 - passing test + > not ok 2 - pretend we have a known breakage # TODO known breakage + > # still have 1 known breakage(s) + > # passed all remaining 1 test(s) + > 1..2 + EOF +" + test_expect_success 'pretend we have fixed a known breakage' " run_sub_test_lib_test passing-todo 'A passing TODO test' <<-\\EOF && test_expect_failure 'pretend we have fixed a known breakage' 'true' @@ -98,6 +147,61 @@ test_expect_success 'pretend we have fixed a known breakage' " EOF " +test_expect_success 'pretend we have a pass, fail, and known breakage' " + test_must_fail run_sub_test_lib_test \ + mixed-results1 'mixed results #1' <<-\\EOF && + test_expect_success 'passing test' 'true' + test_expect_success 'failing test' 'false' + test_expect_failure 'pretend we have a known breakage' 'false' + test_done + EOF + check_sub_test_lib_test mixed-results1 <<-\\EOF + > ok 1 - passing test + > not ok 2 - failing test + > # false + > not ok 3 - pretend we have a known breakage # TODO known breakage + > # still have 1 known breakage(s) + > # failed 1 among remaining 2 test(s) + > 1..3 + EOF +" + +test_expect_success 'pretend we have a mix of all possible results' " + test_must_fail run_sub_test_lib_test \ + mixed-results2 'mixed results #2' <<-\\EOF && + test_expect_success 'passing test' 'true' + test_expect_success 'passing test' 'true' + test_expect_success 'passing test' 'true' + test_expect_success 'passing test' 'true' + test_expect_success 'failing test' 'false' + test_expect_success 'failing test' 'false' + test_expect_success 'failing test' 'false' + test_expect_failure 'pretend we have a known breakage' 'false' + test_expect_failure 'pretend we have a known breakage' 'false' + test_expect_failure 'pretend we have fixed a known breakage' 'true' + test_done + EOF + check_sub_test_lib_test mixed-results2 <<-\\EOF + > ok 1 - passing test + > ok 2 - passing test + > ok 3 - passing test + > ok 4 - passing test + > not ok 5 - failing test + > # false + > not ok 6 - failing test + > # false + > not ok 7 - failing test + > # false + > not ok 8 - pretend we have a known breakage # TODO known breakage + > not ok 9 - pretend we have a known breakage # TODO known breakage + > ok 10 - pretend we have fixed a known breakage # TODO known breakage + > # fixed 1 known breakage(s) + > # still have 2 known breakage(s) + > # failed 3 among remaining 8 test(s) + > 1..10 + EOF +" + test_set_prereq HAVEIT haveit=no test_expect_success HAVEIT 'test runs if prerequisite is satisfied' ' -- 1.7.12.147.g6d168f4