* git log reliability
@ 2012-12-17 9:26 Prasad Karmarkar
2012-12-17 9:38 ` Tomas Carnecky
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Prasad Karmarkar @ 2012-12-17 9:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: git
Hi ,
I have been hearing from my Release Management that git log is not
reliable. Is it so ?
Is there a known instance where Git log has missed out on commits ?
Any information about this would be really helpful
Regards,
Prasad
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: git log reliability
2012-12-17 9:26 git log reliability Prasad Karmarkar
@ 2012-12-17 9:38 ` Tomas Carnecky
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Tomas Carnecky @ 2012-12-17 9:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Prasad Karmarkar, git
On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 14:56:17 +0530, Prasad Karmarkar <prasad.s.karmarkar@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi ,
>
> I have been hearing from my Release Management that git log is not
> reliable. Is it so ?
> Is there a known instance where Git log has missed out on commits ?
>
> Any information about this would be really helpful
Are you talking about git skipping commits due to history simplification (read
the corresponding section in the git-log man page)?
Also, what for does your release management use git log? Maybe there is
a better way to do what you need to do.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-12-17 9:38 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-12-17 9:26 git log reliability Prasad Karmarkar
2012-12-17 9:38 ` Tomas Carnecky
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).