[PATCH v2 0/3] Add bash.showUntrackedFiles config option

[Martin Erik Werner <martinerikwerner@gmail.com>]

On Tue, 2013-02-12 at 14:29 -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Martin Erik Werner <martinerikwerner@gmail.com> writes:
> 
> > Add a test case for the bash.showUntrackedFiles config option, which
> > checks that the config option can disable the global effect of the
> > GIT_PS1_SHOWUNTRACKEDFILES environmant variable.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Martin Erik Werner <martinerikwerner@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  t/t9903-bash-prompt.sh |   11 +++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/t/t9903-bash-prompt.sh b/t/t9903-bash-prompt.sh
> > index f17c1f8..c9417b9 100755
> > --- a/t/t9903-bash-prompt.sh
> > +++ b/t/t9903-bash-prompt.sh
> > @@ -447,6 +447,17 @@ test_expect_success 'prompt - untracked files status indicator - not shown insid
> >  	test_cmp expected "$actual"
> >  '
> >  
> > +test_expect_success 'prompt - untracked files status indicator - disabled by config' '
> > +	printf " (master)" > expected &&
> > +	echo "untracked" > file_untracked &&
> > +	test_config bash.showUntrackedFiles false &&
> > +	(
> > +		GIT_PS1_SHOWUNTRACKEDFILES=y &&
> > +		__git_ps1 > "$actual"
> > +	) &&
> > +	test_cmp expected "$actual"
> > +'
> 
> All six combinations need checking:
> 
>  * not having the configuration at all and not having the shell
>    variable should not show the untracked indicator (already tested).
> 
>  * not having the configuration at all and having the shell variable
>    should show the untracked indicator (already tested).
> 
>  * setting configuration to true without having the shell variable
>    should not show the untracked indicator.
> 
>  * setting configuration to true and having the shell variable
>    should show the unttracked indicator.
> 
>  * setting configuration to false and having the shell variable
>    should not show the untracked indicator (the above test checks
>    this).
> 
>  * setting configuration to false without having the shell variable
>    should not show the untracked indicator.
> 
> to prevent others from breaking the code you wrote for [PATCH 1/2],
> so you need three more tests, I guess?

Ah, yes, I was mimicing what the test did for bash.showDirtyState, I've
now added the three extra tests for bash.showUntrackedFiles, which
should cover all of the above cases, hopefully?

I've also added in the three extra tests for bash.showDirtyState,
equivalently. These only cover the case of dirty files and not
combinations with content in index, which I felt was a bit overkill, is
that reasonable?

Thanks for the review :)

-- 
Martin Erik Werner <martinerikwerner@gmail.com>