From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carlos =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Mart=EDn?= Nieto Subject: Possible regression in ref advertisement Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 17:58:36 +0100 Message-ID: <1361811516.3212.14.camel@centaur.cmartin.tk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Feb 25 18:06:47 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UA1Vk-0006Nt-GW for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 18:06:44 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756539Ab3BYRGT (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Feb 2013 12:06:19 -0500 Received: from hessy.cmartin.tk ([78.47.67.53]:54612 "EHLO hessy.dwim.me" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751535Ab3BYRGS (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Feb 2013 12:06:18 -0500 X-Greylist: delayed 477 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 12:06:18 EST Received: from [192.168.1.2] (p57A1F6E7.dip.t-dialin.net [87.161.246.231]) by hessy.dwim.me (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BBFA18020A for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 17:58:16 +0100 (CET) X-Mailer: Evolution 3.4.4-2 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi all, When testing to see if a different implementation was in shape, I came across something odd where newer git doesn't advertise one of the refs in the git repo. Running `git ls-remote .` or `git-upload-pack` in my git repo, newer git versions omit peeling the v1.8.0-rc3 tag. The diff between the command above when ran with 1.7.10.4 (from Debian) and current 'master' --- old 2013-02-25 17:31:29.583526606 +0100 +++ new 2013-02-25 17:31:36.783526559 +0100 @@ -1379,7 +1379,6 @@ c15295d7477ccec489953299bd03a8e62f86e611 refs/tags/v1.8.0-rc2 cd46259ebf2e624bcee2aaae05c36663d414e1a2 refs/tags/v1.8.0-rc2^{} 22ed067acc84eac8a0a72d20478a18aee4e25571 refs/tags/v1.8.0-rc3 -87a5461fa7b30f7b7baf27204f10219d61500fbf refs/tags/v1.8.0-rc3^{} bfeb8b9ae0012cb61e026cbcd29664876abf5389 refs/tags/v1.8.0.1 ed9fe755130891fc878bb2433204faffb534697b refs/tags/v1.8.0.1^{} 63add1fb45e1ab7a76bb38bbb9467c91fdfaaa7e refs/tags/v1.8.0.2 Diffing with the output from next, diff tells me it's binary for some reason, but looking manually, the peeled v1.8.0-rc3 tag isn't there either. I haven't had time to bisect this, so I'm putting it out there in case anybody wants to investigate before I have time to dig into it. cmn