From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: [PATCH 00/23] Preliminary pack v4 support Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 00:25:44 -0400 Message-ID: <1377577567-27655-1-git-send-email-nico@fluxnic.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Aug 27 06:27:34 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VEAsM-0007jK-2T for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 06:27:30 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752716Ab3H0E0a (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Aug 2013 00:26:30 -0400 Received: from relais.videotron.ca ([24.201.245.36]:47516 "EHLO relais.videotron.ca" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752501Ab3H0E03 (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Aug 2013 00:26:29 -0400 Received: from yoda.home ([70.83.209.44]) by VL-VM-MR006.ip.videotron.ca (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-22.01 64bit (built Apr 21 2011)) with ESMTP id <0MS600G0E9O41090@VL-VM-MR006.ip.videotron.ca> for git@vger.kernel.org; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 00:26:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: from xanadu.home (xanadu.home [192.168.2.2]) by yoda.home (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B4772DA052D for ; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 00:26:28 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.4.22.g54757b7 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Subject says it all... at last ! This can also be fetched here: git://git.linaro.org/people/nico/git Demonstration of what it does at the moment: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/233038 I'd like to preserve the author time stamps as they relate to where in the world I was when the corresponding code was written. You'll notice I didn't work on the code in the same order as it is now presented. Still open question: what to do with a thin pack. Should we really complete it with local objects upon reception, or were we only over paranoid at the time we imposed this rule? Fixing a thin pack version 4 could be possible but not very eleguant. Hence my pondering about relaxing this rule. Comments welcome ! Nicolas