* [PATCH 0/3] Unconfuse git clone when two branches at are HEAD. @ 2013-09-06 15:52 Andreas Krey 2013-09-06 15:56 ` [PATCH 1/3] upload-pack: send the HEAD information Andreas Krey ` (3 more replies) 0 siblings, 4 replies; 32+ messages in thread From: Andreas Krey @ 2013-09-06 15:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Junio C Hamano; +Cc: Git Mailing List Ok, here are some patches that make git actually check out the current remote branch when cloning. Up to now this failed when there were two branches that pointed to the HEAD commit of the remote repo, and git clone would sometimes choose the wrong one as the HEAD ref isn't transmitted in all transport. Stuff the HEAD ref into the capability list (assuming refs are clean enough to do that w/o escaping), and read them out on the other side. All other things were thankfully already in place. Two of the patches have Junio in the From as they are essentially his. Andreas ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/3] upload-pack: send the HEAD information 2013-09-06 15:52 [PATCH 0/3] Unconfuse git clone when two branches at are HEAD Andreas Krey @ 2013-09-06 15:56 ` Andreas Krey 2013-09-06 17:46 ` Junio C Hamano 2013-09-18 2:31 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] Removing the guesswork of HEAD in "clone" Junio C Hamano 2013-09-06 15:56 ` [PATCH 2/3] connect.c: save symref info from server capabilities Andreas Krey ` (2 subsequent siblings) 3 siblings, 2 replies; 32+ messages in thread From: Andreas Krey @ 2013-09-06 15:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Junio C Hamano; +Cc: Git Mailing List From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> This implements the server side of protocol extension to show which branch the HEAD points at. The information is sent as a capability symref=<target>. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> Signed-off-by: Andreas Krey <a.krey@gmx.de> --- upload-pack.c | 8 ++++++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/upload-pack.c b/upload-pack.c index 127e59a..390d1ec 100644 --- a/upload-pack.c +++ b/upload-pack.c @@ -745,13 +745,17 @@ static int send_ref(const char *refname, const unsigned char *sha1, int flag, vo if (mark_our_ref(refname, sha1, flag, cb_data)) return 0; - if (capabilities) - packet_write(1, "%s %s%c%s%s%s agent=%s\n", + if (capabilities) { + unsigned char dummy[20]; + const char *target = resolve_ref_unsafe("HEAD", dummy, 0, NULL); + packet_write(1, "%s %s%c%s%s%s%s%s agent=%s\n", sha1_to_hex(sha1), refname_nons, 0, capabilities, allow_tip_sha1_in_want ? " allow-tip-sha1-in-want" : "", stateless_rpc ? " no-done" : "", + target ? " symref=" : "", target ? target : 0, git_user_agent_sanitized()); + } else packet_write(1, "%s %s\n", sha1_to_hex(sha1), refname_nons); capabilities = NULL; -- 1.8.3.1.485.g9704416.dirty ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/3] upload-pack: send the HEAD information 2013-09-06 15:56 ` [PATCH 1/3] upload-pack: send the HEAD information Andreas Krey @ 2013-09-06 17:46 ` Junio C Hamano 2013-09-06 19:29 ` Andreas Krey 2013-09-08 7:13 ` Jeff King 2013-09-18 2:31 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] Removing the guesswork of HEAD in "clone" Junio C Hamano 1 sibling, 2 replies; 32+ messages in thread From: Junio C Hamano @ 2013-09-06 17:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andreas Krey; +Cc: Git Mailing List Andreas Krey <a.krey@gmx.de> writes: > From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> > > This implements the server side of protocol extension to show which branch > the HEAD points at. The information is sent as a capability symref=<target>. > > Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> > Signed-off-by: Andreas Krey <a.krey@gmx.de> > --- > upload-pack.c | 8 ++++++-- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/upload-pack.c b/upload-pack.c > index 127e59a..390d1ec 100644 > --- a/upload-pack.c > +++ b/upload-pack.c > @@ -745,13 +745,17 @@ static int send_ref(const char *refname, const unsigned char *sha1, int flag, vo > if (mark_our_ref(refname, sha1, flag, cb_data)) > return 0; > > - if (capabilities) > - packet_write(1, "%s %s%c%s%s%s agent=%s\n", > + if (capabilities) { > + unsigned char dummy[20]; > + const char *target = resolve_ref_unsafe("HEAD", dummy, 0, NULL); > + packet_write(1, "%s %s%c%s%s%s%s%s agent=%s\n", > sha1_to_hex(sha1), refname_nons, > 0, capabilities, > allow_tip_sha1_in_want ? " allow-tip-sha1-in-want" : "", > stateless_rpc ? " no-done" : "", > + target ? " symref=" : "", target ? target : 0, > git_user_agent_sanitized()); > + } > else > packet_write(1, "%s %s\n", sha1_to_hex(sha1), refname_nons); > capabilities = NULL; I think it is perfectly fine to expose _only_ HEAD now, and wait until we find a good reason that we should send this information for other symbolic refs in the repository. However, because we already anticipate that we may find such a good reason later, on-the-wire format should be prepared to support such later enhancement. I think sending symref=HEAD:refs/heads/master is probably one good way to do so, as Peff suggested in that old thread ($gmane/102070; note that back then this wasn't suggested as a proper capability so the exact format he suggests in the message is different). Then we could later add advertisements for other symbolic refs if we find it necessary to do so, e.g. symref=HEAD:refs/heads/master symref=refs/remotes/origin/HEAD:refs/remotes/origin/master (all on one line together with other capabilities separated with a SP in between). ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/3] upload-pack: send the HEAD information 2013-09-06 17:46 ` Junio C Hamano @ 2013-09-06 19:29 ` Andreas Krey 2013-09-06 19:54 ` Junio C Hamano 2013-09-08 7:13 ` Jeff King 1 sibling, 1 reply; 32+ messages in thread From: Andreas Krey @ 2013-09-06 19:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Junio C Hamano; +Cc: Git Mailing List On Fri, 06 Sep 2013 10:46:24 +0000, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Andreas Krey <a.krey@gmx.de> writes: > ... > reason later, on-the-wire format should be prepared to support such > later enhancement. I think sending > > symref=HEAD:refs/heads/master Mirco-bikeshed: Should that possibly be symref:HEAD=refs/heads/master as then 'symref:HEAD' is a regular capability key? Andreas -- "Totally trivial. Famous last words." From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@*.org> Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 07:29:21 -0800 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/3] upload-pack: send the HEAD information 2013-09-06 19:29 ` Andreas Krey @ 2013-09-06 19:54 ` Junio C Hamano 0 siblings, 0 replies; 32+ messages in thread From: Junio C Hamano @ 2013-09-06 19:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andreas Krey; +Cc: Git Mailing List Andreas Krey <a.krey@gmx.de> writes: > On Fri, 06 Sep 2013 10:46:24 +0000, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> Andreas Krey <a.krey@gmx.de> writes: >> > ... >> reason later, on-the-wire format should be prepared to support such >> later enhancement. I think sending >> >> symref=HEAD:refs/heads/master > > Mirco-bikeshed: Should that possibly be > > symref:HEAD=refs/heads/master > > as then 'symref:HEAD' is a regular capability key? I doubt that is a good change. We haven't needed (and have refrained from adding) any capability with an unknown name. The variable part should go to the value portion of the token. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/3] upload-pack: send the HEAD information 2013-09-06 17:46 ` Junio C Hamano 2013-09-06 19:29 ` Andreas Krey @ 2013-09-08 7:13 ` Jeff King 2013-09-08 7:22 ` Jeff King 2013-09-08 17:27 ` Junio C Hamano 1 sibling, 2 replies; 32+ messages in thread From: Jeff King @ 2013-09-08 7:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Junio C Hamano; +Cc: Andreas Krey, Git Mailing List On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 10:46:24AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > I think it is perfectly fine to expose _only_ HEAD now, and wait > until we find a good reason that we should send this information for > other symbolic refs in the repository. Yeah, I agree with that. > However, because we already anticipate that we may find such a good > reason later, on-the-wire format should be prepared to support such > later enhancement. I think sending > > symref=HEAD:refs/heads/master > > is probably one good way to do so, as Peff suggested in that old > thread ($gmane/102070; note that back then this wasn't suggested as > a proper capability so the exact format he suggests in the message > is different). Then we could later add advertisements for other > symbolic refs if we find it necessary to do so, e.g. > > symref=HEAD:refs/heads/master > symref=refs/remotes/origin/HEAD:refs/remotes/origin/master > > (all on one line together with other capabilities separated with a > SP in between). It somehow feels a little weird to me that we would output the information about refs/foo on the HEAD line. A few possible issues (and I am playing devil's advocate to some degree here): 1. What if we have a large number of symrefs? Would we run afoul of pkt-line length limits? 2. What's the impact of having to display all symrefs on the first line, before we output other refs? Right now we can just stream out refs as we read them, but we would have to make two passes (and/or cache them all) to find all of the symrefs before we start outputting. Will the extra latency ever matter? What do you think about teaching git to read extra data after "\0" for _every_ ref line? And then ref advertisement might look something like: <sha1> HEAD\0multi_ack thin-pack ... symref=refs/heads/master\n <sha1> refs/heads/master\n <sha1> refs/heads/my-alias\0symref=refs/heads/master That would leave us future room for more ref annotations if we should want them, and I think (but haven't tested) that existing receivers should ignore everything after the NUL. -Peff ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/3] upload-pack: send the HEAD information 2013-09-08 7:13 ` Jeff King @ 2013-09-08 7:22 ` Jeff King 2013-09-08 17:27 ` Junio C Hamano 1 sibling, 0 replies; 32+ messages in thread From: Jeff King @ 2013-09-08 7:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Junio C Hamano; +Cc: Andreas Krey, Git Mailing List On Sun, Sep 08, 2013 at 03:13:59AM -0400, Jeff King wrote: > What do you think about teaching git to read extra data after "\0" for > _every_ ref line? And then ref advertisement might look something like: > > <sha1> HEAD\0multi_ack thin-pack ... symref=refs/heads/master\n > <sha1> refs/heads/master\n > <sha1> refs/heads/my-alias\0symref=refs/heads/master > > That would leave us future room for more ref annotations if we should > want them, and I think (but haven't tested) that existing receivers > should ignore everything after the NUL. Meh, elsewhere you said: The capability list _could_ be sent more than once, and the receiving end is prepared to accept such a stream. Everything learned from an older capability list needs to be forgot and only the last one is honored, I think. and I think you are right. We simply keep a copy of the string the server sent, and when we see a new one, we free the old and replace it. So each subsequent ref would have to re-send the whole capability string (only if it is a symref, but still, it is somewhat ugly). -Peff ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/3] upload-pack: send the HEAD information 2013-09-08 7:13 ` Jeff King 2013-09-08 7:22 ` Jeff King @ 2013-09-08 17:27 ` Junio C Hamano 1 sibling, 0 replies; 32+ messages in thread From: Junio C Hamano @ 2013-09-08 17:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jeff King; +Cc: Andreas Krey, Git Mailing List Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes: > It somehow feels a little weird to me that we would output the > information about refs/foo on the HEAD line. I see that you realized why the above is not the case in the downthread; the capability list is not about describing HEAD. The list happens to be on the line for HEAD merely because HEAD is the first ref. Unfortunately, the "read and replace capability if we see one" (not "read and update capability with newly discovered one on a second and subsequent capability list") is a restriction imposed by existing reader side code that are deployed on the wild, so we need to stick to it until we revamp the protocol in a backward incompatible way (which has been discussed a few times; websearch for "who speaks first" in the list archive). ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 0/6] Removing the guesswork of HEAD in "clone" 2013-09-06 15:56 ` [PATCH 1/3] upload-pack: send the HEAD information Andreas Krey 2013-09-06 17:46 ` Junio C Hamano @ 2013-09-18 2:31 ` Junio C Hamano 2013-09-18 2:31 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] upload-pack.c: do not pass confusing cb_data to mark_our_ref() Junio C Hamano ` (5 more replies) 1 sibling, 6 replies; 32+ messages in thread From: Junio C Hamano @ 2013-09-18 2:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: git; +Cc: Andreas Krey This reworks the old idea from 2008 ($gmane/102039) to teach upload-pack to say where symbolic refs are pointing at in the initial ref advertisement as a new capability "sym", and allow "git clone" to take advantage of that knowledge when deciding what branch to point at with the HEAD of the newly created repository. Thanks go to Andreas Krey for reigniting the ember in a patch series a few weeks ago. I did not do anything more than just compile it once; all the bugs in this round are mine (it is all new code after all). Junio C Hamano (6): upload-pack.c: do not pass confusing cb_data to mark_our_ref() upload-pack: send symbolic ref information as capability upload-pack: send non-HEAD symbolic refs connect.c: make parse_feature_value() static connect: annotate refs with their symref information in get_remote_head() clone: test the new HEAD detection logic cache.h | 1 - connect.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- t/t5601-clone.sh | 11 ++++++++++ upload-pack.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ 4 files changed, 118 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) -- 1.8.4-585-g8d1dcaf ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/6] upload-pack.c: do not pass confusing cb_data to mark_our_ref() 2013-09-18 2:31 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] Removing the guesswork of HEAD in "clone" Junio C Hamano @ 2013-09-18 2:31 ` Junio C Hamano 2013-09-18 2:31 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] upload-pack: send symbolic ref information as capability Junio C Hamano ` (4 subsequent siblings) 5 siblings, 0 replies; 32+ messages in thread From: Junio C Hamano @ 2013-09-18 2:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: git; +Cc: Andreas Krey The callee does not use cb_data, and the caller is an intermediate function in a callchain that later wants to use the cb_data for its own use. Clarify the code by breaking the dataflow explicitly by not passing cb_data down to mark_our_ref(). Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> --- upload-pack.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/upload-pack.c b/upload-pack.c index 127e59a..a6e107f 100644 --- a/upload-pack.c +++ b/upload-pack.c @@ -742,7 +742,7 @@ static int send_ref(const char *refname, const unsigned char *sha1, int flag, vo const char *refname_nons = strip_namespace(refname); unsigned char peeled[20]; - if (mark_our_ref(refname, sha1, flag, cb_data)) + if (mark_our_ref(refname, sha1, flag, NULL)) return 0; if (capabilities) -- 1.8.4-585-g8d1dcaf ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 2/6] upload-pack: send symbolic ref information as capability 2013-09-18 2:31 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] Removing the guesswork of HEAD in "clone" Junio C Hamano 2013-09-18 2:31 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] upload-pack.c: do not pass confusing cb_data to mark_our_ref() Junio C Hamano @ 2013-09-18 2:31 ` Junio C Hamano 2013-09-18 4:36 ` Junio C Hamano 2013-09-18 2:31 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] upload-pack: send non-HEAD symbolic refs Junio C Hamano ` (3 subsequent siblings) 5 siblings, 1 reply; 32+ messages in thread From: Junio C Hamano @ 2013-09-18 2:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: git; +Cc: Andreas Krey One long-standing flaw in the pack transfer protocol was that there was no way to tell the other end which branch "HEAD" points at. With a new "sym" capability (e.g. "sym=HEAD:refs/heads/master"; can be repeated more than once to represent symbolic refs other than HEAD, such as "refs/remotes/origin/HEAD"). Add an infrastructure to collect symbolic refs, format them as extra capabilities and put it on the wire. For now, just send information on the "HEAD" and nothing else. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> --- upload-pack.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/upload-pack.c b/upload-pack.c index a6e107f..53958b9 100644 --- a/upload-pack.c +++ b/upload-pack.c @@ -734,6 +734,16 @@ static int mark_our_ref(const char *refname, const unsigned char *sha1, int flag return 0; } +static void format_symref_info(struct strbuf *buf, struct string_list *symref) +{ + struct string_list_item *item; + + if (!symref->nr) + return; + for_each_string_list_item(item, symref) + strbuf_addf(buf, " sym=%s:%s", item->string, (char *)item->util); +} + static int send_ref(const char *refname, const unsigned char *sha1, int flag, void *cb_data) { static const char *capabilities = "multi_ack thin-pack side-band" @@ -745,32 +755,60 @@ static int send_ref(const char *refname, const unsigned char *sha1, int flag, vo if (mark_our_ref(refname, sha1, flag, NULL)) return 0; - if (capabilities) - packet_write(1, "%s %s%c%s%s%s agent=%s\n", + if (capabilities) { + struct strbuf symref_info = STRBUF_INIT; + + format_symref_info(&symref_info, cb_data); + packet_write(1, "%s %s%c%s%s%s%s agent=%s\n", sha1_to_hex(sha1), refname_nons, 0, capabilities, allow_tip_sha1_in_want ? " allow-tip-sha1-in-want" : "", stateless_rpc ? " no-done" : "", + symref_info.buf, git_user_agent_sanitized()); - else + strbuf_release(&symref_info); + } else { packet_write(1, "%s %s\n", sha1_to_hex(sha1), refname_nons); + } capabilities = NULL; if (!peel_ref(refname, peeled)) packet_write(1, "%s %s^{}\n", sha1_to_hex(peeled), refname_nons); return 0; } +static int find_symref(const char *refname, const unsigned char *sha1, int flag, + void *cb_data) +{ + const char *symref_target; + struct string_list_item *item; + unsigned char unused[20]; + + if ((flag & REF_ISSYMREF) == 0) + return 0; + symref_target = resolve_ref_unsafe(refname, unused, 0, &flag); + if (!symref_target || (flag & REF_ISSYMREF) == 0) + die("'%s' is a symref but it is not?", refname); + item = string_list_append(cb_data, refname); + item->util = xstrdup(symref_target); + return 0; +} + static void upload_pack(void) { + struct string_list symref = STRING_LIST_INIT_DUP; + + head_ref_namespaced(find_symref, &symref); + if (advertise_refs || !stateless_rpc) { reset_timeout(); - head_ref_namespaced(send_ref, NULL); + head_ref_namespaced(send_ref, &symref); for_each_namespaced_ref(send_ref, NULL); packet_flush(1); } else { - head_ref_namespaced(mark_our_ref, NULL); + head_ref_namespaced(mark_our_ref, &symref); for_each_namespaced_ref(mark_our_ref, NULL); } + string_list_clear(&symref, 1); if (advertise_refs) return; -- 1.8.4-585-g8d1dcaf ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] upload-pack: send symbolic ref information as capability 2013-09-18 2:31 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] upload-pack: send symbolic ref information as capability Junio C Hamano @ 2013-09-18 4:36 ` Junio C Hamano 0 siblings, 0 replies; 32+ messages in thread From: Junio C Hamano @ 2013-09-18 4:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: git; +Cc: Andreas Krey Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes: > static void upload_pack(void) > { > + struct string_list symref = STRING_LIST_INIT_DUP; > + > + head_ref_namespaced(find_symref, &symref); > + > if (advertise_refs || !stateless_rpc) { > reset_timeout(); > - head_ref_namespaced(send_ref, NULL); > + head_ref_namespaced(send_ref, &symref); > for_each_namespaced_ref(send_ref, NULL); This one was trying to be too clever; HEAD may be pointing at an unborn branch in which case head_ref_namespaced() will not emit the capability bit, so the second line also needs to be for_each_namespaced_ref(send_ref, &symref); ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 3/6] upload-pack: send non-HEAD symbolic refs 2013-09-18 2:31 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] Removing the guesswork of HEAD in "clone" Junio C Hamano 2013-09-18 2:31 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] upload-pack.c: do not pass confusing cb_data to mark_our_ref() Junio C Hamano 2013-09-18 2:31 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] upload-pack: send symbolic ref information as capability Junio C Hamano @ 2013-09-18 2:31 ` Junio C Hamano 2013-09-18 2:31 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] connect.c: make parse_feature_value() static Junio C Hamano ` (2 subsequent siblings) 5 siblings, 0 replies; 32+ messages in thread From: Junio C Hamano @ 2013-09-18 2:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: git; +Cc: Andreas Krey With the same mechanism as used to tell where "HEAD" points at to the other end, we can tell the target of other symbolic refs as well. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> --- upload-pack.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/upload-pack.c b/upload-pack.c index 53958b9..7ca6154 100644 --- a/upload-pack.c +++ b/upload-pack.c @@ -798,6 +798,7 @@ static void upload_pack(void) struct string_list symref = STRING_LIST_INIT_DUP; head_ref_namespaced(find_symref, &symref); + for_each_namespaced_ref(find_symref, &symref); if (advertise_refs || !stateless_rpc) { reset_timeout(); -- 1.8.4-585-g8d1dcaf ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 4/6] connect.c: make parse_feature_value() static 2013-09-18 2:31 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] Removing the guesswork of HEAD in "clone" Junio C Hamano ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2013-09-18 2:31 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] upload-pack: send non-HEAD symbolic refs Junio C Hamano @ 2013-09-18 2:31 ` Junio C Hamano 2013-09-18 2:31 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] connect: annotate refs with their symref information in get_remote_head() Junio C Hamano 2013-09-18 2:31 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] clone: test the new HEAD detection logic Junio C Hamano 5 siblings, 0 replies; 32+ messages in thread From: Junio C Hamano @ 2013-09-18 2:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: git; +Cc: Andreas Krey Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> --- cache.h | 1 - connect.c | 3 ++- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/cache.h b/cache.h index 85b544f..2c853ba 100644 --- a/cache.h +++ b/cache.h @@ -1098,7 +1098,6 @@ extern struct ref **get_remote_heads(int in, char *src_buf, size_t src_len, extern int server_supports(const char *feature); extern int parse_feature_request(const char *features, const char *feature); extern const char *server_feature_value(const char *feature, int *len_ret); -extern const char *parse_feature_value(const char *feature_list, const char *feature, int *len_ret); extern struct packed_git *parse_pack_index(unsigned char *sha1, const char *idx_path); diff --git a/connect.c b/connect.c index a0783d4..e4c7ae6 100644 --- a/connect.c +++ b/connect.c @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ #include "url.h" static char *server_capabilities; +static const char *parse_feature_value(const char *, const char *, int *); static int check_ref(const char *name, int len, unsigned int flags) { @@ -116,7 +117,7 @@ struct ref **get_remote_heads(int in, char *src_buf, size_t src_len, return list; } -const char *parse_feature_value(const char *feature_list, const char *feature, int *lenp) +static const char *parse_feature_value(const char *feature_list, const char *feature, int *lenp) { int len; -- 1.8.4-585-g8d1dcaf ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 5/6] connect: annotate refs with their symref information in get_remote_head() 2013-09-18 2:31 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] Removing the guesswork of HEAD in "clone" Junio C Hamano ` (3 preceding siblings ...) 2013-09-18 2:31 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] connect.c: make parse_feature_value() static Junio C Hamano @ 2013-09-18 2:31 ` Junio C Hamano 2013-09-18 2:31 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] clone: test the new HEAD detection logic Junio C Hamano 5 siblings, 0 replies; 32+ messages in thread From: Junio C Hamano @ 2013-09-18 2:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: git; +Cc: Andreas Krey Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> --- connect.c | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 60 insertions(+) diff --git a/connect.c b/connect.c index e4c7ae6..a53ef6d 100644 --- a/connect.c +++ b/connect.c @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ #include "run-command.h" #include "remote.h" #include "url.h" +#include "string-list.h" static char *server_capabilities; static const char *parse_feature_value(const char *, const char *, int *); @@ -60,6 +61,61 @@ static void die_initial_contact(int got_at_least_one_head) "and the repository exists."); } +static void parse_one_symref_info(struct string_list *symref, const char *val, int len) +{ + char *sym, *target; + struct string_list_item *item; + + if (!len) + return; /* just "sym" */ + /* e.g. "sym=HEAD:refs/heads/master" */ + sym = xmalloc(len + 1); + memcpy(sym, val, len); + sym[len] = '\0'; + target = strchr(sym, ':'); + if (!target) + /* just "sym=something" */ + goto reject; + *(target++) = '\0'; + if (check_refname_format(sym, REFNAME_ALLOW_ONELEVEL) || + check_refname_format(target, REFNAME_ALLOW_ONELEVEL)) + /* "sym=bogus:pair */ + goto reject; + item = string_list_append(symref, sym); + item->util = target; + return; +reject: + free(sym); + return; +} + +static void annotate_refs_with_symref_info(struct ref *ref) +{ + struct string_list symref = STRING_LIST_INIT_DUP; + const char *feature_list = server_capabilities; + + while (feature_list) { + int len; + const char *val; + + val = parse_feature_value(feature_list, "sym", &len); + if (!val) + break; + parse_one_symref_info(&symref, val, len); + feature_list = val + 1; + } + sort_string_list(&symref); + + for (; ref; ref = ref->next) { + struct string_list_item *item; + item = string_list_lookup(&symref, ref->name); + if (!item) + continue; + ref->symref = xstrdup((char *)item->util); + } + string_list_clear(&symref, 0); +} + /* * Read all the refs from the other end */ @@ -67,6 +123,7 @@ struct ref **get_remote_heads(int in, char *src_buf, size_t src_len, struct ref **list, unsigned int flags, struct extra_have_objects *extra_have) { + struct ref **orig_list = list; int got_at_least_one_head = 0; *list = NULL; @@ -114,6 +171,9 @@ struct ref **get_remote_heads(int in, char *src_buf, size_t src_len, list = &ref->next; got_at_least_one_head = 1; } + + annotate_refs_with_symref_info(*orig_list); + return list; } -- 1.8.4-585-g8d1dcaf ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 6/6] clone: test the new HEAD detection logic 2013-09-18 2:31 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] Removing the guesswork of HEAD in "clone" Junio C Hamano ` (4 preceding siblings ...) 2013-09-18 2:31 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] connect: annotate refs with their symref information in get_remote_head() Junio C Hamano @ 2013-09-18 2:31 ` Junio C Hamano 5 siblings, 0 replies; 32+ messages in thread From: Junio C Hamano @ 2013-09-18 2:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: git; +Cc: Andreas Krey Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> --- t/t5601-clone.sh | 11 +++++++++++ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) diff --git a/t/t5601-clone.sh b/t/t5601-clone.sh index 0629149..ccda6df 100755 --- a/t/t5601-clone.sh +++ b/t/t5601-clone.sh @@ -285,4 +285,15 @@ test_expect_success NOT_MINGW,NOT_CYGWIN 'clone local path foo:bar' ' git clone "./foo:bar" foobar ' +test_expect_success 'clone from a repository with two identical branches' ' + + ( + cd src && + git checkout -b another master + ) && + git clone src target-11 && + test "z$( cd target-11 && git symbolic-ref HEAD )" = zrefs/heads/another + +' + test_done -- 1.8.4-585-g8d1dcaf ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/3] connect.c: save symref info from server capabilities 2013-09-06 15:52 [PATCH 0/3] Unconfuse git clone when two branches at are HEAD Andreas Krey 2013-09-06 15:56 ` [PATCH 1/3] upload-pack: send the HEAD information Andreas Krey @ 2013-09-06 15:56 ` Andreas Krey 2013-09-06 17:56 ` Junio C Hamano 2013-09-06 15:57 ` [PATCH 3/3] clone: test the new HEAD detection logic Andreas Krey 2013-09-06 17:29 ` [PATCH 0/3] Unconfuse git clone when two branches at are HEAD Philip Oakley 3 siblings, 1 reply; 32+ messages in thread From: Andreas Krey @ 2013-09-06 15:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Junio C Hamano; +Cc: Git Mailing List Signed-off-by: Andreas Krey <a.krey@gmx.de> --- connect.c | 11 +++++++++-- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/connect.c b/connect.c index a0783d4..98c4868 100644 --- a/connect.c +++ b/connect.c @@ -72,8 +72,8 @@ struct ref **get_remote_heads(int in, char *src_buf, size_t src_len, for (;;) { struct ref *ref; unsigned char old_sha1[20]; - char *name; - int len, name_len; + char *name, *symref; + int len, name_len, symref_len; char *buffer = packet_buffer; len = packet_read(in, &src_buf, &src_len, @@ -94,9 +94,12 @@ struct ref **get_remote_heads(int in, char *src_buf, size_t src_len, name = buffer + 41; name_len = strlen(name); + symref = 0; if (len != name_len + 41) { free(server_capabilities); server_capabilities = xstrdup(name + name_len + 1); + symref = parse_feature_value(server_capabilities, + "symref", &symref_len); } if (extra_have && @@ -108,6 +111,10 @@ struct ref **get_remote_heads(int in, char *src_buf, size_t src_len, if (!check_ref(name, name_len, flags)) continue; ref = alloc_ref(buffer + 41); + if (symref) { + ref->symref = xcalloc(symref_len + 1, 1); + strncpy(ref->symref, symref, symref_len); + } hashcpy(ref->old_sha1, old_sha1); *list = ref; list = &ref->next; -- 1.8.3.1.485.g9704416.dirty ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/3] connect.c: save symref info from server capabilities 2013-09-06 15:56 ` [PATCH 2/3] connect.c: save symref info from server capabilities Andreas Krey @ 2013-09-06 17:56 ` Junio C Hamano 2013-09-06 19:25 ` Andreas Krey 0 siblings, 1 reply; 32+ messages in thread From: Junio C Hamano @ 2013-09-06 17:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andreas Krey; +Cc: Git Mailing List Andreas Krey <a.krey@gmx.de> writes: > Signed-off-by: Andreas Krey <a.krey@gmx.de> > --- > connect.c | 11 +++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/connect.c b/connect.c > index a0783d4..98c4868 100644 > --- a/connect.c > +++ b/connect.c > @@ -72,8 +72,8 @@ struct ref **get_remote_heads(int in, char *src_buf, size_t src_len, > for (;;) { > struct ref *ref; > unsigned char old_sha1[20]; > - char *name; > - int len, name_len; > + char *name, *symref; > + int len, name_len, symref_len; > char *buffer = packet_buffer; > > len = packet_read(in, &src_buf, &src_len, > @@ -94,9 +94,12 @@ struct ref **get_remote_heads(int in, char *src_buf, size_t src_len, > name = buffer + 41; > > name_len = strlen(name); > + symref = 0; > if (len != name_len + 41) { > free(server_capabilities); > server_capabilities = xstrdup(name + name_len + 1); > + symref = parse_feature_value(server_capabilities, > + "symref", &symref_len); > } > if (extra_have && > @@ -108,6 +111,10 @@ struct ref **get_remote_heads(int in, char *src_buf, size_t src_len, > if (!check_ref(name, name_len, flags)) > continue; > ref = alloc_ref(buffer + 41); > + if (symref) { > + ref->symref = xcalloc(symref_len + 1, 1); > + strncpy(ref->symref, symref, symref_len); > + } > hashcpy(ref->old_sha1, old_sha1); > *list = ref; > list = &ref->next; This looks utterly wrong. HEAD may happen to be the first ref that is advertised and hence capability list typically comes on it, but that does not necessarily have to be the case from the protocol's correctness point of view. I think this function should do this instead. - inside the loop, collect the "symref=..." capabilities; - after the loop, look at the "symref=..." capabilities, and among the refs the loop added to the *list, find the "HEAD" ref and set its ->symref to point at an appropirate ref. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/3] connect.c: save symref info from server capabilities 2013-09-06 17:56 ` Junio C Hamano @ 2013-09-06 19:25 ` Andreas Krey 2013-09-06 19:46 ` Junio C Hamano 0 siblings, 1 reply; 32+ messages in thread From: Andreas Krey @ 2013-09-06 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Junio C Hamano; +Cc: Git Mailing List On Fri, 06 Sep 2013 10:56:51 +0000, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Andreas Krey <a.krey@gmx.de> writes: > ... > > + if (symref) { > > + ref->symref = xcalloc(symref_len + 1, 1); > > + strncpy(ref->symref, symref, symref_len); > > + } ... > > This looks utterly wrong. HEAD may happen to be the first ref that > is advertised and hence capability list typically comes on it, but > that does not necessarily have to be the case from the protocol's > correctness point of view. Ok, then I misunderstood that part. I thought we'd be going to put the symref (if any) into 'capabilities' on the respective ref, but putting them all in one capability list sounds saner all in all. > I think this function should do this instead. > > - inside the loop, collect the "symref=..." capabilities; > > - after the loop, look at the "symref=..." capabilities, and > among the refs the loop added to the *list, find the "HEAD" > ref and set its ->symref to point at an appropirate ref. Fair game. There goes the parse_feature_value; will have to iterate another way (or look them ("symref=#{name}:") up instead of collecting them into a hash beforehand). Can I assume that the only capability list is always on the first ref sent (as it is now)? (And besides, is there something more suitable for the xcalloc/strncpy combination?) Andreas -- "Totally trivial. Famous last words." From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@*.org> Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 07:29:21 -0800 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/3] connect.c: save symref info from server capabilities 2013-09-06 19:25 ` Andreas Krey @ 2013-09-06 19:46 ` Junio C Hamano 0 siblings, 0 replies; 32+ messages in thread From: Junio C Hamano @ 2013-09-06 19:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andreas Krey; +Cc: Git Mailing List Andreas Krey <a.krey@gmx.de> writes: > Can I assume that the only capability list is always on the > first ref sent (as it is now)? The capability list _could_ be sent more than once, and the receiving end is prepared to accept such a stream. Everything learned from an older capability list needs to be forgot and only the last one is honored, I think. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 3/3] clone: test the new HEAD detection logic 2013-09-06 15:52 [PATCH 0/3] Unconfuse git clone when two branches at are HEAD Andreas Krey 2013-09-06 15:56 ` [PATCH 1/3] upload-pack: send the HEAD information Andreas Krey 2013-09-06 15:56 ` [PATCH 2/3] connect.c: save symref info from server capabilities Andreas Krey @ 2013-09-06 15:57 ` Andreas Krey 2013-09-06 17:29 ` [PATCH 0/3] Unconfuse git clone when two branches at are HEAD Philip Oakley 3 siblings, 0 replies; 32+ messages in thread From: Andreas Krey @ 2013-09-06 15:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Junio C Hamano; +Cc: Git Mailing List From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> Signed-off-by: Andreas Krey <a.krey@gmx.de> --- t/t5601-clone.sh | 11 +++++++++++ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) diff --git a/t/t5601-clone.sh b/t/t5601-clone.sh index 0629149..ccda6df 100755 --- a/t/t5601-clone.sh +++ b/t/t5601-clone.sh @@ -285,4 +285,15 @@ test_expect_success NOT_MINGW,NOT_CYGWIN 'clone local path foo:bar' ' git clone "./foo:bar" foobar ' +test_expect_success 'clone from a repository with two identical branches' ' + + ( + cd src && + git checkout -b another master + ) && + git clone src target-11 && + test "z$( cd target-11 && git symbolic-ref HEAD )" = zrefs/heads/another + +' + test_done -- 1.8.3.1.485.g9704416.dirty ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/3] Unconfuse git clone when two branches at are HEAD. 2013-09-06 15:52 [PATCH 0/3] Unconfuse git clone when two branches at are HEAD Andreas Krey ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2013-09-06 15:57 ` [PATCH 3/3] clone: test the new HEAD detection logic Andreas Krey @ 2013-09-06 17:29 ` Philip Oakley 2013-09-06 18:17 ` Junio C Hamano 3 siblings, 1 reply; 32+ messages in thread From: Philip Oakley @ 2013-09-06 17:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andreas Krey, Junio C Hamano; +Cc: Git Mailing List From: "Andreas Krey" <a.krey@gmx.de> > Ok, here are some patches that make git actually > check out the current remote branch when cloning. > > Up to now this failed when there were two branches that pointed to > the HEAD commit of the remote repo, and git clone would sometimes > choose the wrong one as the HEAD ref isn't transmitted in all > transport. > > Stuff the HEAD ref into the capability list (assuming refs are clean > enough to do that w/o escaping), and read them out on the other > side. All other things were thankfully already in place. > > Two of the patches have Junio in the From as they are essentially his. > > Andreas > -- Does this have any impact on the alleged bug in `git bundle --all` (which can then be cloned from) where the current HEAD ref wasn't included in the bundle? Or am I mis-remembering? Philip ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/3] Unconfuse git clone when two branches at are HEAD. 2013-09-06 17:29 ` [PATCH 0/3] Unconfuse git clone when two branches at are HEAD Philip Oakley @ 2013-09-06 18:17 ` Junio C Hamano 2013-09-06 23:19 ` Philip Oakley 0 siblings, 1 reply; 32+ messages in thread From: Junio C Hamano @ 2013-09-06 18:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Philip Oakley; +Cc: Andreas Krey, Git Mailing List "Philip Oakley" <philipoakley@iee.org> writes: > Does this have any impact on the alleged bug in `git bundle --all` > (which can then be cloned from) where the current HEAD ref wasn't > included in the bundle? Or am I mis-remembering? Not "current HEAD ref", but "git clone" will fail to check out from a bundle that does not include HEAD ref (it is easy to just say "reset --hard master" or whatever after it, though). I think I suggested to update "git bundle" to include HEAD when there is no HEAD specified some time ago, but I do not think anybody was interested, so this may be a non-issue. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/3] Unconfuse git clone when two branches at are HEAD. 2013-09-06 18:17 ` Junio C Hamano @ 2013-09-06 23:19 ` Philip Oakley 2013-09-07 15:50 ` Junio C Hamano 0 siblings, 1 reply; 32+ messages in thread From: Philip Oakley @ 2013-09-06 23:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Junio C Hamano; +Cc: Andreas Krey, Git Mailing List From: "Junio C Hamano" <gitster@pobox.com> > "Philip Oakley" <philipoakley@iee.org> writes: > >> Does this have any impact on the alleged bug in `git bundle --all` >> (which can then be cloned from) where the current HEAD ref wasn't >> included in the bundle? Or am I mis-remembering? > > Not "current HEAD ref", but "git clone" will fail to check out from > a bundle that does not include HEAD ref (it is easy to just say > "reset --hard master" or whatever after it, though). > > I think I suggested to update "git bundle" to include HEAD when > there is no HEAD specified some time ago, but I do not think anybody > was interested, so this may be a non-issue. > Just had a quick look at a very quick test repo (10 objects, 2 branches) and the bundle file does contain the HEAD ref, but again it has the two ref/heads/* are better than one problem, in that the clone from the bundle checks out master, whilst the source repo has feature checked out. Philip ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/3] Unconfuse git clone when two branches at are HEAD. 2013-09-06 23:19 ` Philip Oakley @ 2013-09-07 15:50 ` Junio C Hamano 2013-09-07 19:19 ` Philip Oakley 0 siblings, 1 reply; 32+ messages in thread From: Junio C Hamano @ 2013-09-07 15:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Philip Oakley; +Cc: Andreas Krey, Git Mailing List "Philip Oakley" <philipoakley@iee.org> writes: > From: "Junio C Hamano" <gitster@pobox.com> >> "Philip Oakley" <philipoakley@iee.org> writes: >> >>> Does this have any impact on the alleged bug in `git bundle --all` >>> (which can then be cloned from) where the current HEAD ref wasn't >>> included in the bundle? Or am I mis-remembering? >> >> Not "current HEAD ref", but "git clone" will fail to check out from >> a bundle that does not include HEAD ref (it is easy to just say >> "reset --hard master" or whatever after it, though). >> >> I think I suggested to update "git bundle" to include HEAD when >> there is no HEAD specified some time ago, but I do not think anybody >> was interested, so this may be a non-issue. >> > Just had a quick look at a very quick test repo (10 objects, 2 > branches) and the bundle file does contain the HEAD ref, but again it > has the two ref/heads/* are better than one problem, in that the clone > from the bundle checks out master, whilst the source repo has feature > checked out. I do not think the bundle header records symref any differently from other refs, so a HEAD that points at a commit that is at the tip of more than one ref needs to be guessed at the extraction end, just like the network-transfer case discussed in this thread. But this thread is not about updating the current bundle format to a new one, so any of the updates proposed in these patches will not affect it. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/3] Unconfuse git clone when two branches at are HEAD. 2013-09-07 15:50 ` Junio C Hamano @ 2013-09-07 19:19 ` Philip Oakley 2013-09-08 17:35 ` Junio C Hamano 0 siblings, 1 reply; 32+ messages in thread From: Philip Oakley @ 2013-09-07 19:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Junio C Hamano; +Cc: Andreas Krey, Git Mailing List From: "Junio C Hamano" <gitster@pobox.com> Sent: Saturday, September 07, 2013 4:50 PM > "Philip Oakley" <philipoakley@iee.org> writes: >> From: "Junio C Hamano" <gitster@pobox.com> >>> "Philip Oakley" <philipoakley@iee.org> writes: >>> >>>> Does this have any impact on the alleged bug in `git bundle --all` >>>> (which can then be cloned from) where the current HEAD ref wasn't >>>> included in the bundle? Or am I mis-remembering? >>> >>> Not "current HEAD ref", but "git clone" will fail to check out from >>> a bundle that does not include HEAD ref (it is easy to just say >>> "reset --hard master" or whatever after it, though). >>> >>> I think I suggested to update "git bundle" to include HEAD when >>> there is no HEAD specified some time ago, but I do not think anybody >>> was interested, so this may be a non-issue. >>> >> Just had a quick look at a very quick test repo (10 objects, 2 >> branches) and the bundle file does contain the HEAD ref, but again it >> has the two ref/heads/* are better than one problem, in that the >> clone >> from the bundle checks out master, whilst the source repo has feature >> checked out. > > I do not think the bundle header records symref any differently from > other refs, so a HEAD that points at a commit that is at the tip of > more than one ref needs to be guessed at the extraction end, just > like the network-transfer case discussed in this thread. > > But this thread is not about updating the current bundle format to a > new one, so any of the updates proposed in these patches will not > affect it. > -- I was having a quick look at the different bundle/clone routes and tried out (on 1.8.1.msysgit.1) the following script to see the differences (probably word wrap damaged): --- cd /c/ # if on Windows to be at the top of c:/ mkdir gitBundleTest1 cd gitBundleTest1 git init echo AAA >a.txt git add a.txt git commit -mfirst git checkout -b feature git checkout -b zulu # does this, alphabetically after master, change anything? git status # observe on 'feature' branch # one repo, one file, one commit, two branches # test the bundle - clone transfer git bundle create Repo.bundle --all git clone Repo.bundle ../gitBundleTest2 cd ../gitBundleTest2 git status # observe on wrong branch # back to original repo cd ../gitBundleTest1 # test the direct clone transfer git clone . ../gitBundleTest3 cd ../gitBundleTest3 git status # observe on wrong branch again # back to top level (wherever that is on Msys Windows ;-) cd .. pwd # test the git protocol clone transfer # it's file:// followed by abolute path /path/to/dir so ... # but note msys windows /c/ git clone file:///c/gitBundleTest1 ./gitBundleTest4 cd ./gitBundleTest4 git status # observe on wrong branch again cd ~ # return home --- What I observed was that all the clones had the same HEAD problem, which I think comes from clone.c: guess_remote_head(). When I looked in the Repo.bundle file I saw the refs/heads/* listed in alphabetic order followed by HEAD, all with the same sha1 (in this case), followed by PACK and then the binary data. My quick look at clone.c suggested to me that there would be a lot of commonality between the bundle data stream and the transport streams (identical?), and it was just a case of adding into the bundle data the same HEAD symref indication that would solve the normal clone problem (including backward compatibility). Is that a reasonable assesssment? Philip ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/3] Unconfuse git clone when two branches at are HEAD. 2013-09-07 19:19 ` Philip Oakley @ 2013-09-08 17:35 ` Junio C Hamano 2013-09-08 21:00 ` Philip Oakley 0 siblings, 1 reply; 32+ messages in thread From: Junio C Hamano @ 2013-09-08 17:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Philip Oakley; +Cc: Andreas Krey, Git Mailing List "Philip Oakley" <philipoakley@iee.org> writes: > What I observed was that all the clones had the same HEAD problem, > which I think comes from clone.c: guess_remote_head(). Yes. They share "having to guess" property because their data source does not tell them. > My quick look at clone.c suggested to me that there would be a lot of > commonality between the bundle data stream and the transport streams > (identical?), and it was just a case of adding into the bundle data > the same HEAD symref indication that would solve the normal clone > problem (including backward compatibility). Is that a reasonable > assesssment? You need to find a hole in the existing readers to stick the new information in a way that do not break existing readers but allow updated readers to extract that information. That is exactly what we did when we added the protocol capability. I do not offhand think an equivalent hole exists in the bundle file format. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/3] Unconfuse git clone when two branches at are HEAD. 2013-09-08 17:35 ` Junio C Hamano @ 2013-09-08 21:00 ` Philip Oakley 2013-09-09 14:44 ` Junio C Hamano 0 siblings, 1 reply; 32+ messages in thread From: Philip Oakley @ 2013-09-08 21:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Junio C Hamano; +Cc: Andreas Krey, Git Mailing List From: "Junio C Hamano" <gitster@pobox.com> Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2013 6:35 PM > "Philip Oakley" <philipoakley@iee.org> writes: > >> What I observed was that all the clones had the same HEAD problem, >> which I think comes from clone.c: guess_remote_head(). > > Yes. They share "having to guess" property because their data > source does not tell them. > >> My quick look at clone.c suggested to me that there would be a lot of >> commonality between the bundle data stream and the transport streams >> (identical?), and it was just a case of adding into the bundle data >> the same HEAD symref indication that would solve the normal clone >> problem (including backward compatibility). Is that a reasonable >> assesssment? > > You need to find a hole in the existing readers to stick the new > information in a way that do not break existing readers but allow > updated readers to extract that information. That is exactly what > we did when we added the protocol capability. I do not offhand > think an equivalent hole exists in the bundle file format. > -- I've been rummaging about as to options. One is to extend the ref format such that <sha1> refs/heads/Test:HEAD would be considered a valid indicator of a symref relationship (i.e. using the typical 'colon' style). It would be appended after the regular refs, so all the existing refs are still transported. The point is that while it produces an error, it doesn't stop the cloning, and the error message "error: * Ignoring funny ref 'refs/remotes/origin/Test:HEAD' locally" gives a pretty clear statement of intent to those with older versions of git. Another alternative is to add an additional name space (e.g.) <sha1> refs/remotes/origin/HEAD/Test which would simply be an extra directory layer that reflects where the HEAD should have been. Though this namespace example has the D/F conflict. Philip ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/3] Unconfuse git clone when two branches at are HEAD. 2013-09-08 21:00 ` Philip Oakley @ 2013-09-09 14:44 ` Junio C Hamano 2013-09-09 16:08 ` Andreas Krey 2013-09-09 22:20 ` Philip Oakley 0 siblings, 2 replies; 32+ messages in thread From: Junio C Hamano @ 2013-09-09 14:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Philip Oakley; +Cc: Andreas Krey, Git Mailing List "Philip Oakley" <philipoakley@iee.org> writes: > One is to extend the ref format such that > <sha1> refs/heads/Test:HEAD > would be considered a valid indicator of a symref relationship > (i.e. using the typical 'colon' style). It would be appended after the > regular refs, so all the existing refs are still transported. > > The point is that while it produces an error, it doesn't stop the > cloning, and the error message > "error: * Ignoring funny ref 'refs/remotes/origin/Test:HEAD' locally" > gives a pretty clear statement of intent to those with older versions > of git. Cute. If it does not stop any of these: git ls-remote such.bundle git clone such.bundle git fetch such.bundle git fetch such.bundle master ;# if 'master' branch is in it git ls-remote such.bundle git ls-remote such.bundle master ;# if 'master' branch is in it even if some of them may give error messages, I think that may be a workable escape hatch. > Another alternative is to add an additional name space (e.g.) > <sha1> refs/remotes/origin/HEAD/Test > which would simply be an extra directory layer that reflects where the > HEAD should have been. Though this namespace example has the D/F > conflict. I'd rather not go this route. Allowing refs/heads/master and local branches that forked from it in refs/heads/master/{a,b,c,...} could be a potentially useful future enhancement, and this approach will close the door for it. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/3] Unconfuse git clone when two branches at are HEAD. 2013-09-09 14:44 ` Junio C Hamano @ 2013-09-09 16:08 ` Andreas Krey 2013-09-09 22:20 ` Philip Oakley 1 sibling, 0 replies; 32+ messages in thread From: Andreas Krey @ 2013-09-09 16:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Junio C Hamano; +Cc: Philip Oakley, Git Mailing List On Mon, 09 Sep 2013 07:44:04 +0000, Junio C Hamano wrote: ... > I'd rather not go this route. Allowing refs/heads/master and local > branches that forked from it in refs/heads/master/{a,b,c,...} could > be a potentially useful future enhancement, Want! We're currently going the route of naming the branches master feature/master feature/subfeature/master to allow feature/subfeature/topic, and feature/subfeature in the first place. (Other hierarchy separator candidates were ugly, shell-unwieldy, already commonly used within branch names, or illegal.) Andreas -- "Totally trivial. Famous last words." From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@*.org> Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 07:29:21 -0800 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/3] Unconfuse git clone when two branches at are HEAD. 2013-09-09 14:44 ` Junio C Hamano 2013-09-09 16:08 ` Andreas Krey @ 2013-09-09 22:20 ` Philip Oakley 2013-09-09 22:26 ` Junio C Hamano 1 sibling, 1 reply; 32+ messages in thread From: Philip Oakley @ 2013-09-09 22:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Junio C Hamano; +Cc: Andreas Krey, Git Mailing List From: "Junio C Hamano" <gitster@pobox.com> Sent: Monday, September 09, 2013 3:44 PM > "Philip Oakley" <philipoakley@iee.org> writes: > >> One is to extend the ref format such that >> <sha1> refs/heads/Test:HEAD >> would be considered a valid indicator of a symref relationship >> (i.e. using the typical 'colon' style). It would be appended after >> the >> regular refs, so all the existing refs are still transported. >> >> The point is that while it produces an error, it doesn't stop the >> cloning, and the error message >> "error: * Ignoring funny ref 'refs/remotes/origin/Test:HEAD' locally" >> gives a pretty clear statement of intent to those with older versions >> of git. > > Cute. If it does not stop any of these: > > git ls-remote such.bundle > git clone such.bundle > git fetch such.bundle > git fetch such.bundle master ;# if 'master' branch is in it > git ls-remote such.bundle > git ls-remote such.bundle master ;# if 'master' branch is in it > > even if some of them may give error messages, I think that may be a > workable escape hatch. > These look to work OK. Not sure If I've properly covered all the options. A nice feature is that ls-remote will find the fake ref ! $ git ls-remote /c/gitBundleTest1/RepoHEADnomaster.bundle Test:HEAD 41ccb18028d1cb6516251e94cef1cd5cb3f0bcb5 refs/heads/Test:HEAD It's only the clone that barfs (so far) (which could be 'fixed'). Obviously, if it can be made to work, one check would be that the two refs (HEAD and refs/heads/wherever) point to the came commit before generating the HEAD symref. Philip ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/3] Unconfuse git clone when two branches at are HEAD. 2013-09-09 22:20 ` Philip Oakley @ 2013-09-09 22:26 ` Junio C Hamano 0 siblings, 0 replies; 32+ messages in thread From: Junio C Hamano @ 2013-09-09 22:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Philip Oakley; +Cc: Andreas Krey, Git Mailing List "Philip Oakley" <philipoakley@iee.org> writes: > These look to work OK. Not sure If I've properly covered all the > options. > > A nice feature is that ls-remote will find the fake ref ! > > $ git ls-remote /c/gitBundleTest1/RepoHEADnomaster.bundle Test:HEAD > 41ccb18028d1cb6516251e94cef1cd5cb3f0bcb5 refs/heads/Test:HEAD > > It's only the clone that barfs (so far) (which could be 'fixed'). You cannot 'fix' the ones deployed in the wild, but I think saying "funny ref" and not aborting is a good compromise. The updated documentation for bundle can mention that error message and explain that the older version of "clone" will say that in what situation. I didn't notice it the first time, but I think the above would read better and match what has been discussed on the on-the-wire format to swap the order, i.e. use "HEAD:refs/heads/Test" to mean "HEAD is a symref that points at the Test branch". > Obviously, if it can be made to work, one check would be that the two > refs (HEAD and refs/heads/wherever) point to the came commit before > generating the HEAD symref. Yes, that is a sensible check. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-09-18 4:36 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 32+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2013-09-06 15:52 [PATCH 0/3] Unconfuse git clone when two branches at are HEAD Andreas Krey 2013-09-06 15:56 ` [PATCH 1/3] upload-pack: send the HEAD information Andreas Krey 2013-09-06 17:46 ` Junio C Hamano 2013-09-06 19:29 ` Andreas Krey 2013-09-06 19:54 ` Junio C Hamano 2013-09-08 7:13 ` Jeff King 2013-09-08 7:22 ` Jeff King 2013-09-08 17:27 ` Junio C Hamano 2013-09-18 2:31 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] Removing the guesswork of HEAD in "clone" Junio C Hamano 2013-09-18 2:31 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] upload-pack.c: do not pass confusing cb_data to mark_our_ref() Junio C Hamano 2013-09-18 2:31 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] upload-pack: send symbolic ref information as capability Junio C Hamano 2013-09-18 4:36 ` Junio C Hamano 2013-09-18 2:31 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] upload-pack: send non-HEAD symbolic refs Junio C Hamano 2013-09-18 2:31 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] connect.c: make parse_feature_value() static Junio C Hamano 2013-09-18 2:31 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] connect: annotate refs with their symref information in get_remote_head() Junio C Hamano 2013-09-18 2:31 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] clone: test the new HEAD detection logic Junio C Hamano 2013-09-06 15:56 ` [PATCH 2/3] connect.c: save symref info from server capabilities Andreas Krey 2013-09-06 17:56 ` Junio C Hamano 2013-09-06 19:25 ` Andreas Krey 2013-09-06 19:46 ` Junio C Hamano 2013-09-06 15:57 ` [PATCH 3/3] clone: test the new HEAD detection logic Andreas Krey 2013-09-06 17:29 ` [PATCH 0/3] Unconfuse git clone when two branches at are HEAD Philip Oakley 2013-09-06 18:17 ` Junio C Hamano 2013-09-06 23:19 ` Philip Oakley 2013-09-07 15:50 ` Junio C Hamano 2013-09-07 19:19 ` Philip Oakley 2013-09-08 17:35 ` Junio C Hamano 2013-09-08 21:00 ` Philip Oakley 2013-09-09 14:44 ` Junio C Hamano 2013-09-09 16:08 ` Andreas Krey 2013-09-09 22:20 ` Philip Oakley 2013-09-09 22:26 ` Junio C Hamano
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).