From: Krzesimir Nowak <krzesimir@endocode.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: "Eric Sunshine" <sunshine@sunshineco.com>,
"Git List" <git@vger.kernel.org>,
"Jakub Narębski" <jnareb@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] gitweb: Add an option for adding more branch refs
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 12:49:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1385639357.2075.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqob55sgww.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
On Wed, 2013-11-27 at 12:55 -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> writes:
>
> > On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> wrote:
> >> On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Krzesimir Nowak
> >> <krzesimir@endocode.com> wrote:
> >>> Overriding an @additional_branch_refs configuration variable with
> >>> value ('wip') will make gitweb to show branches that appear in
> >>> refs/heads and refs/wip (refs/heads is hardcoded).
>
> "branches" are by definition what are in refs/heads/ hierarchy, so
>
> Allow @additional_branch_refs configuration variable to tell
> gitweb to show refs from additional hierarchies in addition to
> branches in the list-of-branches view.
>
> would be more appropriate and sufficient.
Thanks.
>
> >> Mentioning $ref in the error message would help the user resolve the
> >> problem more quickly.
> >>
> >>> + die_error(500, '"heads" specified in @additional_branch_refs') if ($ref eq 'heads');
> >>
> >> Rephrasing this as
> >>
> >> "heads" disallowed in @additional_branch_refs
> >>
> >> would better explain the problem to a user who has only made a cursory
> >> read of the documentation.
> >
> > The program could easily filter out the redundant 'heads', so does
> > this really deserve a diagnostic?
>
> True.
Ok, I'm deduping both heads and other refs as well. Now we send 500 only
if the ref is simply invalid.
>
> I was primarily worried about metacharacters in the specified
> strings getting in the way of regexp matches the new code allows on
> them, but that has been resolved with the use of \Q..\E; if that
> automatic deduping is done, I do not immediately see any remaining
> issues in the latest round of the patch.
>
New patch in "[PATCH v3] gitweb: Add an option for adding more branch
refs". Thanks for reviews!
> Thanks.
--
Krzesimir Nowak
Software Developer
Endocode AG
krzesimir@endocode.com
------
Endocode AG, Johannisstraße 20, 10117 Berlin
info@endocode.com | www.endocode.com
Vorstandsvorsitzender: Mirko Boehm
Vorstände: Dr. Karl Beecher, Chris Kühl, Sebastian Sucker
Aufsichtsratsvorsitzende: Jennifer Beecher
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Charlottenburg - HRB 150748 B
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-28 11:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-27 15:30 [PATCH v2] gitweb: Add an option for adding more branch refs Krzesimir Nowak
2013-11-27 20:34 ` Eric Sunshine
2013-11-27 20:38 ` Eric Sunshine
2013-11-27 20:55 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-11-28 11:49 ` Krzesimir Nowak [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1385639357.2075.3.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=krzesimir@endocode.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=jnareb@gmail.com \
--cc=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).