From: Ronnie Sahlberg <sahlberg@google.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: gitster@pobox.com, Ronnie Sahlberg <sahlberg@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] refs.c: move reflog updates into its own function
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 10:55:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1406310926-4080-2-git-send-email-sahlberg@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1406310926-4080-1-git-send-email-sahlberg@google.com>
write_ref_sha1 tries to update the reflog while updating the ref.
Move these reflog changes out into its own function so that we can do the
same thing if we write a sha1 ref differently, for example by writing a ref
to the packed refs file instead.
Signed-off-by: Ronnie Sahlberg <sahlberg@google.com>
---
refs.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/refs.c b/refs.c
index 619725a..1048017 100644
--- a/refs.c
+++ b/refs.c
@@ -2869,6 +2869,39 @@ static int is_branch(const char *refname)
return !strcmp(refname, "HEAD") || starts_with(refname, "refs/heads/");
}
+static int write_sha1_update_reflog(struct ref_lock *lock,
+ const unsigned char *sha1, const char *logmsg)
+{
+ if (log_ref_write(lock->ref_name, lock->old_sha1, sha1, logmsg) < 0 ||
+ (strcmp(lock->ref_name, lock->orig_ref_name) &&
+ log_ref_write(lock->orig_ref_name, lock->old_sha1, sha1, logmsg) < 0)) {
+ return -1;
+ }
+ if (strcmp(lock->orig_ref_name, "HEAD") != 0) {
+ /*
+ * Special hack: If a branch is updated directly and HEAD
+ * points to it (may happen on the remote side of a push
+ * for example) then logically the HEAD reflog should be
+ * updated too.
+ * A generic solution implies reverse symref information,
+ * but finding all symrefs pointing to the given branch
+ * would be rather costly for this rare event (the direct
+ * update of a branch) to be worth it. So let's cheat and
+ * check with HEAD only which should cover 99% of all usage
+ * scenarios (even 100% of the default ones).
+ */
+ unsigned char head_sha1[20];
+ int head_flag;
+ const char *head_ref;
+ head_ref = resolve_ref_unsafe("HEAD", head_sha1,
+ RESOLVE_REF_READING, &head_flag);
+ if (head_ref && (head_flag & REF_ISSYMREF) &&
+ !strcmp(head_ref, lock->ref_name))
+ log_ref_write("HEAD", lock->old_sha1, sha1, logmsg);
+ }
+ return 0;
+}
+
/*
* Writes sha1 into the ref specified by the lock. Makes sure that errno
* is sane on error.
@@ -2912,34 +2945,10 @@ static int write_ref_sha1(struct ref_lock *lock,
return -1;
}
clear_loose_ref_cache(&ref_cache);
- if (log_ref_write(lock->ref_name, lock->old_sha1, sha1, logmsg) < 0 ||
- (strcmp(lock->ref_name, lock->orig_ref_name) &&
- log_ref_write(lock->orig_ref_name, lock->old_sha1, sha1, logmsg) < 0)) {
+ if (write_sha1_update_reflog(lock, sha1, logmsg)) {
unlock_ref(lock);
return -1;
}
- if (strcmp(lock->orig_ref_name, "HEAD") != 0) {
- /*
- * Special hack: If a branch is updated directly and HEAD
- * points to it (may happen on the remote side of a push
- * for example) then logically the HEAD reflog should be
- * updated too.
- * A generic solution implies reverse symref information,
- * but finding all symrefs pointing to the given branch
- * would be rather costly for this rare event (the direct
- * update of a branch) to be worth it. So let's cheat and
- * check with HEAD only which should cover 99% of all usage
- * scenarios (even 100% of the default ones).
- */
- unsigned char head_sha1[20];
- int head_flag;
- const char *head_ref;
- head_ref = resolve_ref_unsafe("HEAD", head_sha1,
- RESOLVE_REF_READING, &head_flag);
- if (head_ref && (head_flag & REF_ISSYMREF) &&
- !strcmp(head_ref, lock->ref_name))
- log_ref_write("HEAD", lock->old_sha1, sha1, logmsg);
- }
if (commit_ref(lock)) {
error("Couldn't set %s", lock->ref_name);
unlock_ref(lock);
@@ -3649,7 +3658,8 @@ int transaction_commit(struct ref_transaction *transaction,
continue;
if (get_packed_ref(update->refname))
continue;
- if (!resolve_ref_unsafe(update->refname, sha1, 1, NULL))
+ if (!resolve_ref_unsafe(update->refname, sha1,
+ RESOLVE_REF_READING, NULL))
continue;
add_packed_ref(update->refname, sha1);
--
2.0.1.518.g4f5a8ad
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-25 17:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-25 17:55 [PATCH 0/5] use packed refs for ref-transactions Ronnie Sahlberg
2014-07-25 17:55 ` Ronnie Sahlberg [this message]
2014-07-25 17:55 ` [PATCH 2/5] refs.c: write updates to packed refs when a transaction has more than one ref Ronnie Sahlberg
2014-07-29 21:09 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-07-30 19:19 ` Ronnie Sahlberg
2014-07-29 21:11 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-07-30 19:20 ` Ronnie Sahlberg
2014-07-25 17:55 ` [PATCH 3/5] remote.c: use a transaction for deleting refs Ronnie Sahlberg
2014-07-25 17:55 ` [PATCH 4/5] refs.c: make repack_without_refs static Ronnie Sahlberg
2014-07-25 17:55 ` [PATCH 5/5] refs.c: make the *_packed_refs functions static Ronnie Sahlberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1406310926-4080-2-git-send-email-sahlberg@google.com \
--to=sahlberg@google.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).