From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 18/19] signed push: remove duplicated protocol info
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 13:30:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1408739424-31429-19-git-send-email-gitster@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1408739424-31429-1-git-send-email-gitster@pobox.com>
With the interim protocol, we used to send the update commands even
though we already send a signed copy of the same information when
push certificate is in use. Update the send-pack/receive-pack pair
not to do so.
The notable thing on the receive-pack side is that it makes sure
that there is no command sent over the traditional protocol packet
outside the push certificate. Otherwise a pusher can claim to be
pushing one set of ref updates in the signed certificate while
issuing commands to update unrelated refs, and such an update will
evade later audits.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
---
Documentation/technical/pack-protocol.txt | 20 ++++++++++++++-
Documentation/technical/protocol-capabilities.txt | 12 +++++++--
builtin/receive-pack.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++--
send-pack.c | 2 +-
4 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/technical/pack-protocol.txt b/Documentation/technical/pack-protocol.txt
index a845d51..b86580b 100644
--- a/Documentation/technical/pack-protocol.txt
+++ b/Documentation/technical/pack-protocol.txt
@@ -465,7 +465,7 @@ contain all the objects that the server will need to complete the new
references.
----
- update-request = *shallow command-list [pack-file]
+ update-request = *shallow ( command-list | push-cert ) [pack-file]
shallow = PKT-LINE("shallow" SP obj-id)
@@ -481,12 +481,30 @@ references.
old-id = obj-id
new-id = obj-id
+ push-cert = PKT-LINE("push-cert" NUL capability-list LF)
+ PKT-LINE("certificate version 0.1" LF)
+ PKT-LINE("pusher" ident LF)
+ PKT-LINE(LF)
+ *PKT-LINE(command LF)
+ *PKT-LINE(GPG signature lines LF)
+ PKT-LINE("push-cert-end" LF)
+
pack-file = "PACK" 28*(OCTET)
----
If the receiving end does not support delete-refs, the sending end MUST
NOT ask for delete command.
+If the receiving end does not support push-cert, the sending end MUST
+NOT send a push-cert command.
+
+When a push-cert command is sent, command-list MUST NOT be sent; the
+commands recorded in the push certificate is used instead. The GPG
+signature lines are a detached signature for the contents recorded in
+the push certificate before the signature block begins and are used
+to certify that the commands were given by the pusher, who must be
+the signer.
+
The pack-file MUST NOT be sent if the only command used is 'delete'.
A pack-file MUST be sent if either create or update command is used,
diff --git a/Documentation/technical/protocol-capabilities.txt b/Documentation/technical/protocol-capabilities.txt
index e174343..a478cc4 100644
--- a/Documentation/technical/protocol-capabilities.txt
+++ b/Documentation/technical/protocol-capabilities.txt
@@ -18,8 +18,8 @@ was sent. Server MUST NOT ignore capabilities that client requested
and server advertised. As a consequence of these rules, server MUST
NOT advertise capabilities it does not understand.
-The 'report-status', 'delete-refs', and 'quiet' capabilities are sent and
-recognized by the receive-pack (push to server) process.
+The 'report-status', 'delete-refs', 'quiet', and 'push-cert' capabilities
+are sent and recognized by the receive-pack (push to server) process.
The 'ofs-delta' and 'side-band-64k' capabilities are sent and recognized
by both upload-pack and receive-pack protocols. The 'agent' capability
@@ -250,3 +250,11 @@ allow-tip-sha1-in-want
If the upload-pack server advertises this capability, fetch-pack may
send "want" lines with SHA-1s that exist at the server but are not
advertised by upload-pack.
+
+push-cert
+---------
+
+The receive-pack server that advertises this capability is willing
+to accept a signed push certificate. A send-pack client MUST NOT
+send a push-cert packet unless the receive-pack server advertises
+this capability.
diff --git a/builtin/receive-pack.c b/builtin/receive-pack.c
index abdc296..991e417 100644
--- a/builtin/receive-pack.c
+++ b/builtin/receive-pack.c
@@ -880,7 +880,7 @@ static void execute_commands(struct command *commands,
"the reported refs above");
}
-static struct command **queue_command(struct command **p,
+static struct command **queue_command(struct command **tail,
const char *line,
int linelen)
{
@@ -903,10 +903,32 @@ static struct command **queue_command(struct command **p,
hashcpy(cmd->new_sha1, new_sha1);
memcpy(cmd->ref_name, refname, reflen);
cmd->ref_name[reflen] = '\0';
- *p = cmd;
+ *tail = cmd;
return &cmd->next;
}
+static void queue_commands_from_cert(struct command **tail,
+ struct strbuf *push_cert)
+{
+ const char *boc, *eoc;
+
+ if (*tail)
+ die("protocol error: got both push certificate and unsigned commands");
+
+ boc = strstr(push_cert->buf, "\n\n");
+ if (!boc)
+ die("malformed push certificate %.*s", 100, push_cert->buf);
+ else
+ boc += 2;
+ eoc = push_cert->buf + parse_signature(push_cert->buf, push_cert->len);
+
+ while (boc < eoc) {
+ const char *eol = memchr(boc, '\n', eoc - boc);
+ tail = queue_command(tail, boc, eol ? eol - boc : eoc - eol);
+ boc = eol ? eol + 1 : eoc;
+ }
+}
+
static struct command *read_head_info(struct sha1_array *shallow)
{
struct command *commands = NULL;
@@ -962,6 +984,10 @@ static struct command *read_head_info(struct sha1_array *shallow)
p = queue_command(p, line, linelen);
}
+
+ if (push_cert.len)
+ queue_commands_from_cert(p, &push_cert);
+
return commands;
}
diff --git a/send-pack.c b/send-pack.c
index 4125892..61f321d 100644
--- a/send-pack.c
+++ b/send-pack.c
@@ -363,7 +363,7 @@ int send_pack(struct send_pack_args *args,
for (ref = remote_refs; ref; ref = ref->next) {
char *old_hex, *new_hex;
- if (args->dry_run)
+ if (args->dry_run || args->push_cert)
continue;
if (!ref_update_to_be_sent(ref, args))
--
2.1.0-304-g950f846
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-22 20:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-22 20:30 [PATCH v2 00/19] Signed push Junio C Hamano
2014-08-22 20:30 ` [PATCH v2 01/19] receive-pack: do not overallocate command structure Junio C Hamano
2014-08-22 20:30 ` [PATCH v2 02/19] receive-pack: parse feature request a bit earlier Junio C Hamano
2014-08-22 20:30 ` [PATCH v2 03/19] receive-pack: do not reuse old_sha1[] for other things Junio C Hamano
2014-08-22 20:30 ` [PATCH v2 04/19] receive-pack: factor out queueing of command Junio C Hamano
2014-08-22 20:30 ` [PATCH v2 05/19] send-pack: move REF_STATUS_REJECT_NODELETE logic a bit higher Junio C Hamano
2014-08-22 20:30 ` [PATCH v2 06/19] send-pack: refactor decision to send update per ref Junio C Hamano
2014-08-22 20:30 ` [PATCH v2 07/19] send-pack: always send capabilities Junio C Hamano
2014-08-22 20:30 ` [PATCH v2 08/19] send-pack: factor out capability string generation Junio C Hamano
2014-08-22 20:30 ` [PATCH v2 09/19] send-pack: rename "new_refs" to "need_pack_data" Junio C Hamano
2014-08-22 20:30 ` [PATCH v2 10/19] send-pack: refactor inspecting and resetting status and sending commands Junio C Hamano
2014-08-22 20:30 ` [PATCH v2 11/19] send-pack: clarify that cmds_sent is a boolean Junio C Hamano
2014-08-22 20:30 ` [PATCH v2 12/19] gpg-interface: move parse_gpg_output() to where it should be Junio C Hamano
2014-08-22 20:30 ` [PATCH v2 13/19] gpg-interface: move parse_signature() " Junio C Hamano
2014-08-22 20:30 ` [PATCH v2 14/19] pack-protocol doc: typofix for PKT-LINE Junio C Hamano
2014-08-22 20:30 ` [PATCH v2 15/19] the beginning of the signed push Junio C Hamano
2014-08-22 20:30 ` [PATCH v2 16/19] receive-pack: GPG-validate push certificates Junio C Hamano
2014-08-22 20:30 ` [PATCH v2 17/19] send-pack: send feature request on push-cert packet Junio C Hamano
2014-08-22 20:30 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2014-08-22 20:30 ` [PATCH v2 19/19] signed push: fortify against replay attacks Junio C Hamano
2014-08-24 3:29 ` Eric Sunshine
2014-08-30 11:59 ` Stefan Beller
2014-09-02 17:40 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1408739424-31429-19-git-send-email-gitster@pobox.com \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).