From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 19/21] signed push: remove duplicated protocol info
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 13:04:55 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1409861097-19151-20-git-send-email-gitster@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1409861097-19151-1-git-send-email-gitster@pobox.com>
With the interim protocol, we used to send the update commands even
though we already send a signed copy of the same information when
push certificate is in use. Update the send-pack/receive-pack pair
not to do so.
The notable thing on the receive-pack side is that it makes sure
that there is no command sent over the traditional protocol packet
outside the push certificate. Otherwise a pusher can claim to be
pushing one set of ref updates in the signed certificate while
issuing commands to update unrelated refs, and such an update will
evade later audits.
Finally, start documenting the protocol.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
---
Documentation/technical/pack-protocol.txt | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
Documentation/technical/protocol-capabilities.txt | 12 +++++++--
builtin/receive-pack.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++--
send-pack.c | 2 +-
4 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/technical/pack-protocol.txt b/Documentation/technical/pack-protocol.txt
index a845d51..4a5c2e8 100644
--- a/Documentation/technical/pack-protocol.txt
+++ b/Documentation/technical/pack-protocol.txt
@@ -465,7 +465,7 @@ contain all the objects that the server will need to complete the new
references.
----
- update-request = *shallow command-list [pack-file]
+ update-request = *shallow ( command-list | push-cert ) [pack-file]
shallow = PKT-LINE("shallow" SP obj-id)
@@ -481,12 +481,25 @@ references.
old-id = obj-id
new-id = obj-id
+ push-cert = PKT-LINE("push-cert" NUL capability-list LF)
+ PKT-LINE("certificate version 0.1" LF)
+ PKT-LINE("pusher" SP ident LF)
+ PKT-LINE(LF)
+ *PKT-LINE(command LF)
+ *PKT-LINE(gpg-signature-lines LF)
+ PKT-LINE("push-cert-end" LF)
+
pack-file = "PACK" 28*(OCTET)
----
If the receiving end does not support delete-refs, the sending end MUST
NOT ask for delete command.
+If the receiving end does not support push-cert, the sending end
+MUST NOT send a push-cert command. When a push-cert command is
+sent, command-list MUST NOT be sent; the commands recorded in the
+push certificate is used instead.
+
The pack-file MUST NOT be sent if the only command used is 'delete'.
A pack-file MUST be sent if either create or update command is used,
@@ -501,6 +514,24 @@ was being processed (the obj-id is still the same as the old-id), and
it will run any update hooks to make sure that the update is acceptable.
If all of that is fine, the server will then update the references.
+Push Certificate
+----------------
+
+A push certificate begins with a set of header lines. After the
+header and an empty line, the protocol commands follow, one per
+line.
+
+Currently, the following header fields are defined:
+
+`pusher` ident::
+ Identify the GPG key in "Human Readable Name <email@address>"
+ format.
+
+The GPG signature lines are a detached signature for the contents
+recorded in the push certificate before the signature block begins.
+The detached signature is used to certify that the commands were
+given by the pusher, who must be the signer.
+
Report Status
-------------
diff --git a/Documentation/technical/protocol-capabilities.txt b/Documentation/technical/protocol-capabilities.txt
index e174343..a478cc4 100644
--- a/Documentation/technical/protocol-capabilities.txt
+++ b/Documentation/technical/protocol-capabilities.txt
@@ -18,8 +18,8 @@ was sent. Server MUST NOT ignore capabilities that client requested
and server advertised. As a consequence of these rules, server MUST
NOT advertise capabilities it does not understand.
-The 'report-status', 'delete-refs', and 'quiet' capabilities are sent and
-recognized by the receive-pack (push to server) process.
+The 'report-status', 'delete-refs', 'quiet', and 'push-cert' capabilities
+are sent and recognized by the receive-pack (push to server) process.
The 'ofs-delta' and 'side-band-64k' capabilities are sent and recognized
by both upload-pack and receive-pack protocols. The 'agent' capability
@@ -250,3 +250,11 @@ allow-tip-sha1-in-want
If the upload-pack server advertises this capability, fetch-pack may
send "want" lines with SHA-1s that exist at the server but are not
advertised by upload-pack.
+
+push-cert
+---------
+
+The receive-pack server that advertises this capability is willing
+to accept a signed push certificate. A send-pack client MUST NOT
+send a push-cert packet unless the receive-pack server advertises
+this capability.
diff --git a/builtin/receive-pack.c b/builtin/receive-pack.c
index bfd078c..2d93c87 100644
--- a/builtin/receive-pack.c
+++ b/builtin/receive-pack.c
@@ -899,7 +899,7 @@ static void execute_commands(struct command *commands,
"the reported refs above");
}
-static struct command **queue_command(struct command **p,
+static struct command **queue_command(struct command **tail,
const char *line,
int linelen)
{
@@ -922,10 +922,32 @@ static struct command **queue_command(struct command **p,
hashcpy(cmd->new_sha1, new_sha1);
memcpy(cmd->ref_name, refname, reflen);
cmd->ref_name[reflen] = '\0';
- *p = cmd;
+ *tail = cmd;
return &cmd->next;
}
+static void queue_commands_from_cert(struct command **tail,
+ struct strbuf *push_cert)
+{
+ const char *boc, *eoc;
+
+ if (*tail)
+ die("protocol error: got both push certificate and unsigned commands");
+
+ boc = strstr(push_cert->buf, "\n\n");
+ if (!boc)
+ die("malformed push certificate %.*s", 100, push_cert->buf);
+ else
+ boc += 2;
+ eoc = push_cert->buf + parse_signature(push_cert->buf, push_cert->len);
+
+ while (boc < eoc) {
+ const char *eol = memchr(boc, '\n', eoc - boc);
+ tail = queue_command(tail, boc, eol ? eol - boc : eoc - eol);
+ boc = eol ? eol + 1 : eoc;
+ }
+}
+
static struct command *read_head_info(struct sha1_array *shallow)
{
struct command *commands = NULL;
@@ -981,6 +1003,10 @@ static struct command *read_head_info(struct sha1_array *shallow)
p = queue_command(p, line, linelen);
}
+
+ if (push_cert.len)
+ queue_commands_from_cert(p, &push_cert);
+
return commands;
}
diff --git a/send-pack.c b/send-pack.c
index 4125892..61f321d 100644
--- a/send-pack.c
+++ b/send-pack.c
@@ -363,7 +363,7 @@ int send_pack(struct send_pack_args *args,
for (ref = remote_refs; ref; ref = ref->next) {
char *old_hex, *new_hex;
- if (args->dry_run)
+ if (args->dry_run || args->push_cert)
continue;
if (!ref_update_to_be_sent(ref, args))
--
2.1.0-399-g1364b4d
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-04 20:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-04 20:04 [PATCH v3 00/21] Signed push Junio C Hamano
2014-09-04 20:04 ` [PATCH v3 01/21] receive-pack: do not overallocate command structure Junio C Hamano
2014-09-04 20:04 ` [PATCH v3 02/21] receive-pack: parse feature request a bit earlier Junio C Hamano
2014-09-04 20:04 ` [PATCH v3 03/21] receive-pack: do not reuse old_sha1[] for other things Junio C Hamano
2014-09-04 20:04 ` [PATCH v3 04/21] receive-pack: factor out queueing of command Junio C Hamano
2014-09-04 20:04 ` [PATCH v3 05/21] send-pack: move REF_STATUS_REJECT_NODELETE logic a bit higher Junio C Hamano
2014-09-04 20:04 ` [PATCH v3 06/21] send-pack: refactor decision to send update per ref Junio C Hamano
2014-09-04 20:04 ` [PATCH v3 07/21] send-pack: always send capabilities Junio C Hamano
2014-09-04 20:04 ` [PATCH v3 08/21] send-pack: factor out capability string generation Junio C Hamano
2014-09-04 20:04 ` [PATCH v3 09/21] receive-pack: " Junio C Hamano
2014-09-04 20:04 ` [PATCH v3 10/21] send-pack: rename "new_refs" to "need_pack_data" Junio C Hamano
2014-09-04 20:04 ` [PATCH v3 11/21] send-pack: refactor inspecting and resetting status and sending commands Junio C Hamano
2014-09-04 20:04 ` [PATCH v3 12/21] send-pack: clarify that cmds_sent is a boolean Junio C Hamano
2014-09-04 20:04 ` [PATCH v3 13/21] gpg-interface: move parse_gpg_output() to where it should be Junio C Hamano
2014-09-04 20:04 ` [PATCH v3 14/21] gpg-interface: move parse_signature() " Junio C Hamano
2014-09-04 20:04 ` [PATCH v3 15/21] pack-protocol doc: typofix for PKT-LINE Junio C Hamano
2014-09-04 20:04 ` [PATCH v3 16/21] push: the beginning of "git push --signed" Junio C Hamano
2014-09-04 20:04 ` [PATCH v3 17/21] receive-pack: GPG-validate push certificates Junio C Hamano
2014-09-04 20:04 ` [PATCH v3 18/21] send-pack: send feature request on push-cert packet Junio C Hamano
2014-09-04 20:04 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2014-09-04 20:04 ` [PATCH v3 20/21] signed push: add "pushee" header to push certificate Junio C Hamano
2014-09-04 21:13 ` Shawn Pearce
2014-09-04 20:04 ` [PATCH v3 21/21] signed push: fortify against replay attacks Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1409861097-19151-20-git-send-email-gitster@pobox.com \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).