From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 05/22] send-pack: move REF_STATUS_REJECT_NODELETE logic a bit higher
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2014 13:54:53 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1409950510-10209-6-git-send-email-gitster@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1409950510-10209-1-git-send-email-gitster@pobox.com>
20e8b465 (refactor ref status logic for pushing, 2010-01-08)
restructured the code to set status for each ref to be pushed, but
did not quite go far enough. We inspect the status set earlier by
set_refs_status_for_push() and then perform yet another update to
the status of a ref with an otherwise OK status to be deleted to
mark it with REF_STATUS_REJECT_NODELETE when the protocol tells us
never to delete.
Split the latter into a separate loop that comes before we enter the
per-ref loop. This way we would have one less condition to check in
the main loop.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
---
send-pack.c | 15 ++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/send-pack.c b/send-pack.c
index 6129b0f..22a1709 100644
--- a/send-pack.c
+++ b/send-pack.c
@@ -231,6 +231,15 @@ int send_pack(struct send_pack_args *args,
return 0;
}
+ /*
+ * NEEDSWORK: why does delete-refs have to be so specific to
+ * send-pack machinery that set_ref_status_for_push() cannot
+ * set this bit for us???
+ */
+ for (ref = remote_refs; ref; ref = ref->next)
+ if (ref->deletion && !allow_deleting_refs)
+ ref->status = REF_STATUS_REJECT_NODELETE;
+
if (!args->dry_run)
advertise_shallow_grafts_buf(&req_buf);
@@ -249,17 +258,13 @@ int send_pack(struct send_pack_args *args,
case REF_STATUS_REJECT_FETCH_FIRST:
case REF_STATUS_REJECT_NEEDS_FORCE:
case REF_STATUS_REJECT_STALE:
+ case REF_STATUS_REJECT_NODELETE:
case REF_STATUS_UPTODATE:
continue;
default:
; /* do nothing */
}
- if (ref->deletion && !allow_deleting_refs) {
- ref->status = REF_STATUS_REJECT_NODELETE;
- continue;
- }
-
if (!ref->deletion)
new_refs++;
--
2.1.0-399-g2df620b
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-05 20:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-05 20:54 [PATCH v4 00/22] Signed push Junio C Hamano
2014-09-05 20:54 ` [PATCH v4 01/22] receive-pack: do not overallocate command structure Junio C Hamano
2014-09-05 20:54 ` [PATCH v4 02/22] receive-pack: parse feature request a bit earlier Junio C Hamano
2014-09-05 20:54 ` [PATCH v4 03/22] receive-pack: do not reuse old_sha1[] for other things Junio C Hamano
2014-09-05 20:54 ` [PATCH v4 04/22] receive-pack: factor out queueing of command Junio C Hamano
2014-09-05 20:54 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2014-09-05 20:54 ` [PATCH v4 06/22] send-pack: refactor decision to send update per ref Junio C Hamano
2014-09-05 20:54 ` [PATCH v4 07/22] send-pack: always send capabilities Junio C Hamano
2014-09-05 20:54 ` [PATCH v4 08/22] send-pack: factor out capability string generation Junio C Hamano
2014-09-05 20:54 ` [PATCH v4 09/22] receive-pack: " Junio C Hamano
2014-09-05 20:54 ` [PATCH v4 10/22] send-pack: rename "new_refs" to "need_pack_data" Junio C Hamano
2014-09-05 20:54 ` [PATCH v4 11/22] send-pack: refactor inspecting and resetting status and sending commands Junio C Hamano
2014-09-05 20:55 ` [PATCH v4 12/22] send-pack: clarify that cmds_sent is a boolean Junio C Hamano
2014-09-05 20:55 ` [PATCH v4 13/22] gpg-interface: move parse_gpg_output() to where it should be Junio C Hamano
2014-09-05 20:55 ` [PATCH v4 14/22] gpg-interface: move parse_signature() " Junio C Hamano
2014-09-05 20:55 ` [PATCH v4 15/22] pack-protocol doc: typofix for PKT-LINE Junio C Hamano
2014-09-05 20:55 ` [PATCH v4 16/22] push: the beginning of "git push --signed" Junio C Hamano
2014-09-05 20:55 ` [PATCH v4 17/22] receive-pack: GPG-validate push certificates Junio C Hamano
2014-09-05 20:55 ` [PATCH v4 18/22] send-pack: send feature request on push-cert packet Junio C Hamano
2014-09-05 20:55 ` [PATCH v4 19/22] signed push: remove duplicated protocol info Junio C Hamano
2014-09-05 20:55 ` [PATCH v4 20/22] signed push: add "pushee" header to push certificate Junio C Hamano
2014-09-05 20:55 ` [PATCH v4 21/22] signed push: fortify against replay attacks Junio C Hamano
2014-09-05 20:55 ` [PATCH v4 22/22] signed push: allow stale nonce in stateless mode Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1409950510-10209-6-git-send-email-gitster@pobox.com \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).