From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jason Riedy Subject: Re: [Census] So who uses git? Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 08:15:43 -0800 Message-ID: <14138.1138810543@lotus.CS.Berkeley.EDU> References: Cc: Git Mailing List X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Feb 01 17:17:37 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F4Ke4-0002C9-8h for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2006 17:15:48 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964855AbWBAQPp (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Feb 2006 11:15:45 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964942AbWBAQPp (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Feb 2006 11:15:45 -0500 Received: from lotus.CS.Berkeley.EDU ([128.32.36.222]:13974 "EHLO lotus.CS.Berkeley.EDU") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964855AbWBAQPp (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Feb 2006 11:15:45 -0500 Received: from lotus.CS.Berkeley.EDU (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lotus.CS.Berkeley.EDU (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k11GFixV014140 for ; Wed, 1 Feb 2006 08:15:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from lotus.CS.Berkeley.EDU (ejr@localhost) by lotus.CS.Berkeley.EDU (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) with ESMTP id k11GFhrW014139 for ; Wed, 1 Feb 2006 08:15:44 -0800 (PST) In-reply-to: To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: And Linus Torvalds writes: - - Has anybody used git over NFS? If it's this bad (or even close to), I - guess the "mark files as up-to-date in the index" approach is a really - good idea.. My normal use is on NFS (Solaris and Linux) and IBM's GPFS (AIX and Linux). I haven't noticed any particular problems, and LAPACK and the reference BLAS make a moderately sized working set of around 3000 source files. Not kernel sized, but not tiny. However, I mostly use git over NFS on a relatively slow machine. NFS is faster than the local disk... Jason