From: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
To: gitster@pobox.com, git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ronnie Sahlberg <sahlberg@google.com>,
Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH] refs.c: move reflog updates into its own function
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 16:38:02 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1416530282-13192-1-git-send-email-sbeller@google.com> (raw)
From: Ronnie Sahlberg <sahlberg@google.com>
write_ref_sha1 tries to update the reflog while updating the ref.
Move these reflog changes out into its own function so that we can do the
same thing if we write a sha1 ref differently, for example by writing a ref
to the packed refs file instead.
No functional changes intended. We only move some code out into a separate
function.
Signed-off-by: Ronnie Sahlberg <sahlberg@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
---
Examining the refs-transaction-reflog series a bit closer, this seems to be
one of the last independant patches, which make sense to rip out on a per-patch
basis.
refs.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/refs.c b/refs.c
index 005eb18..6837367 100644
--- a/refs.c
+++ b/refs.c
@@ -3043,6 +3043,40 @@ int is_branch(const char *refname)
return !strcmp(refname, "HEAD") || starts_with(refname, "refs/heads/");
}
+static int write_sha1_update_reflog(struct ref_lock *lock,
+ const unsigned char *sha1, const char *logmsg)
+{
+ if (log_ref_write(lock->ref_name, lock->old_sha1, sha1, logmsg) < 0 ||
+ (strcmp(lock->ref_name, lock->orig_ref_name) &&
+ log_ref_write(lock->orig_ref_name, lock->old_sha1, sha1, logmsg) < 0)) {
+ unlock_ref(lock);
+ return -1;
+ }
+ if (strcmp(lock->orig_ref_name, "HEAD") != 0) {
+ /*
+ * Special hack: If a branch is updated directly and HEAD
+ * points to it (may happen on the remote side of a push
+ * for example) then logically the HEAD reflog should be
+ * updated too.
+ * A generic solution implies reverse symref information,
+ * but finding all symrefs pointing to the given branch
+ * would be rather costly for this rare event (the direct
+ * update of a branch) to be worth it. So let's cheat and
+ * check with HEAD only which should cover 99% of all usage
+ * scenarios (even 100% of the default ones).
+ */
+ unsigned char head_sha1[20];
+ int head_flag;
+ const char *head_ref;
+ head_ref = resolve_ref_unsafe("HEAD", RESOLVE_REF_READING,
+ head_sha1, &head_flag);
+ if (head_ref && (head_flag & REF_ISSYMREF) &&
+ !strcmp(head_ref, lock->ref_name))
+ log_ref_write("HEAD", lock->old_sha1, sha1, logmsg);
+ }
+ return 0;
+}
+
/*
* Write sha1 into the ref specified by the lock. Make sure that errno
* is sane on error.
@@ -3086,34 +3120,10 @@ static int write_ref_sha1(struct ref_lock *lock,
return -1;
}
clear_loose_ref_cache(&ref_cache);
- if (log_ref_write(lock->ref_name, lock->old_sha1, sha1, logmsg) < 0 ||
- (strcmp(lock->ref_name, lock->orig_ref_name) &&
- log_ref_write(lock->orig_ref_name, lock->old_sha1, sha1, logmsg) < 0)) {
+ if (write_sha1_update_reflog(lock, sha1, logmsg)) {
unlock_ref(lock);
return -1;
}
- if (strcmp(lock->orig_ref_name, "HEAD") != 0) {
- /*
- * Special hack: If a branch is updated directly and HEAD
- * points to it (may happen on the remote side of a push
- * for example) then logically the HEAD reflog should be
- * updated too.
- * A generic solution implies reverse symref information,
- * but finding all symrefs pointing to the given branch
- * would be rather costly for this rare event (the direct
- * update of a branch) to be worth it. So let's cheat and
- * check with HEAD only which should cover 99% of all usage
- * scenarios (even 100% of the default ones).
- */
- unsigned char head_sha1[20];
- int head_flag;
- const char *head_ref;
- head_ref = resolve_ref_unsafe("HEAD", RESOLVE_REF_READING,
- head_sha1, &head_flag);
- if (head_ref && (head_flag & REF_ISSYMREF) &&
- !strcmp(head_ref, lock->ref_name))
- log_ref_write("HEAD", lock->old_sha1, sha1, logmsg);
- }
if (commit_ref(lock)) {
error("Couldn't set %s", lock->ref_name);
unlock_ref(lock);
--
2.2.0.rc2.23.gca0107e
next reply other threads:[~2014-11-21 0:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-21 0:38 Stefan Beller [this message]
2014-11-24 21:24 ` [PATCH] refs.c: move reflog updates into its own function Stefan Beller
2014-11-24 21:50 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1416530282-13192-1-git-send-email-sbeller@google.com \
--to=sbeller@google.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=sahlberg@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).