[PATCH] send-pack: unify error messages for unsupported capabilities

[Ralf Thielow <ralf.thielow@gmail.com>]

If --signed is not supported, the error message names the remote
"receiving end". If --atomic is not supported, the error message
names the remote "server". Unify the naming to "receiving end"
as we're in the context of "push".

Signed-off-by: Ralf Thielow <ralf.thielow@gmail.com>
---
 send-pack.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/send-pack.c b/send-pack.c
index 9d2b0c5..189bdde 100644
--- a/send-pack.c
+++ b/send-pack.c
@@ -356,21 +356,21 @@ int send_pack(struct send_pack_args *args,
 			die(_("the receiving end does not support --signed push"));
 		push_cert_nonce = xmemdupz(push_cert_nonce, len);
 	}
 
 	if (!remote_refs) {
 		fprintf(stderr, "No refs in common and none specified; doing nothing.\n"
 			"Perhaps you should specify a branch such as 'master'.\n");
 		return 0;
 	}
 	if (args->atomic && !atomic_supported)
-		die(_("server does not support --atomic push"));
+		die(_("the receiving end does not support --atomic push"));
 
 	use_atomic = atomic_supported && args->atomic;
 
 	if (status_report)
 		strbuf_addstr(&cap_buf, " report-status");
 	if (use_sideband)
 		strbuf_addstr(&cap_buf, " side-band-64k");
 	if (quiet_supported && (args->quiet || !args->progress))
 		strbuf_addstr(&cap_buf, " quiet");
 	if (use_atomic)
-- 
2.4.0.rc0.243.g0be2dd7