From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Turner Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/7] ref backend preamble Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 13:51:13 -0400 Organization: Twitter Message-ID: <1436550673.4542.66.camel@twopensource.com> References: <1436482260-28088-1-git-send-email-dturner@twopensource.com> <8C71190FFE324B1599E89376429C8F84@PhilipOakley> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, mhagger@alum.mit.edu, j6t@kdbg.org To: Philip Oakley X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Jul 10 19:51:34 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZDcSQ-0006G0-TH for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 19:51:31 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932948AbbGJRvX (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Jul 2015 13:51:23 -0400 Received: from mail-qg0-f53.google.com ([209.85.192.53]:32944 "EHLO mail-qg0-f53.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751286AbbGJRvQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Jul 2015 13:51:16 -0400 Received: by qgef3 with SMTP id f3so82820602qge.0 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 10:51:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:organization:content-type:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ATCvdfvrsOsn71vMLPcCjIDG0x/ENVh6+I0slP+WT0I=; b=hfhLs09yhAv247tuGc9/MTjA5mO6PFcIWTY2nYUFXhRGiNy03shiX7ehrQDS5SxoA4 NuF5oqRoAMnyTF8MIbvzdPA8rb7QUoOz0MAIXoKMW/OUNQqli5jy3CnyvxuIelb4rN0J fpNhlEx/4vORLh/lGb5f8oIgCyQcp93pJ/HAINgsFkTwEvKoAsma4xiX94qyNwSxAjky EcrmeQIvgd3MpWhiJqwGsQAp+BUMeiJdDyCoBmXVhXp3bBiHXuA3kp3gbO7ykU1H/9AP IF9J1ROy2Lz1bFtFpBEZjUpGQC0SdYGDqUT5v/6QPR4Ts5B/Js+Q/rhIkkmITETyyFTL 2+wQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkcYJd1T0kP8glNlowbX6RUayx/d1vJAgQeW23mfhvC+fs7jIDxjdi2SYaxcMM/m3V5P3FG X-Received: by 10.140.97.230 with SMTP id m93mr34959193qge.32.1436550676091; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 10:51:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ubuntu ([192.133.79.145]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p26sm5815314qkp.11.2015.07.10.10.51.14 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 10 Jul 2015 10:51:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8C71190FFE324B1599E89376429C8F84@PhilipOakley> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.11-0ubuntu3 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Fri, 2015-07-10 at 15:34 +0100, Philip Oakley wrote: > From: "David Turner" > > The current state of the discussion on alternate ref backends is that > > we're going to continue to store pseudorefs (e.g. CHERRY_PICK_HEAD) as > > Assuming this is accepted, should the definition of pseudorefs be > included in the gitglossary? > > Once ref backends become common, the distinction will needed in the > docs. This term is only in this message (that is, I don't think I used it in any commit messages yet). The code uses it in at least one place already. But yes, I think if we decided to go with the pseudoref concept, we should document it.