From: Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: j6t@kdbg.org, gitster@pobox.com, Karthik Nayak <Karthik.188@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4] ref-filter: fallback on alphabetical comparison
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 14:15:28 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1446194728-7944-1-git-send-email-Karthik.188@gmail.com> (raw)
In ref-filter.c the comparison of refs while sorting is handled by
cmp_ref_sorting() function. When sorting as per numerical values
(e.g. --sort=objectsize) there is no fallback comparison when both
refs hold the same value. This can cause unexpected results (i.e. the
order of listing refs with equal values cannot be pre-determined) as
pointed out by Johannes Sixt ($gmane/280117).
Hence, fallback to alphabetical comparison based on the refname
whenever the other criterion is equal.
A test in t3203 was expecting that branch-two sorts before HEAD, which
happened to be how qsort(3) on Linux sorted the array, but (1) that
outcome was not even guaranteed, and (2) once we start breaking ties
with the refname, "HEAD" should sort before "branch-two" so the
original expectation was inconsistent with the criterion we now use.
Update it to match the new world order, which we can now depend on
being stable.
Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Reported-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
Signed-off-by: Karthik Nayak <Karthik.188@gmail.com>
---
ref-filter.c | 2 +-
t/t3203-branch-output.sh | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ref-filter.c b/ref-filter.c
index 046e73b..7b33cb8 100644
--- a/ref-filter.c
+++ b/ref-filter.c
@@ -1698,7 +1698,7 @@ static int cmp_ref_sorting(struct ref_sorting *s, struct ref_array_item *a, stru
if (va->ul < vb->ul)
cmp = -1;
else if (va->ul == vb->ul)
- cmp = 0;
+ cmp = strcmp(a->refname, b->refname);
else
cmp = 1;
}
diff --git a/t/t3203-branch-output.sh b/t/t3203-branch-output.sh
index f77971c..9f2d482 100755
--- a/t/t3203-branch-output.sh
+++ b/t/t3203-branch-output.sh
@@ -158,8 +158,8 @@ EOF
test_expect_success 'git branch `--sort` option' '
cat >expect <<-\EOF &&
- branch-two
* (HEAD detached from fromtag)
+ branch-two
branch-one
master
EOF
--
2.6.2
next reply other threads:[~2015-10-30 8:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-30 8:45 Karthik Nayak [this message]
2015-10-30 22:51 ` [PATCH v4] ref-filter: fallback on alphabetical comparison Johannes Sixt
2015-10-30 22:54 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1446194728-7944-1-git-send-email-Karthik.188@gmail.com \
--to=karthik.188@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=j6t@kdbg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).