git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Turner <dturner@twopensource.com>
To: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>,
	Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, peff@peff.net, pclouds@gmail.com,
	Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsayjones.plus.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/21] replacement for dt/refs-backend-lmdb v7 patch 04/33
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 16:12:50 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1459282370.2976.7.camel@twopensource.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56F76E2C.5030700@alum.mit.edu>

On Sun, 2016-03-27 at 07:22 +0200, Michael Haggerty wrote:
> On 03/24/2016 07:47 AM, David Turner wrote:
> > [...]
> > I incorporated your changes into the lmdb backend.  To make merging
> > later more convenient, I rebased on top of pu -- I think this
> > mainly
> > depends on jk/check-repository-format, but I also included some
> > fixes
> > for a couple of tests that had been changed by other patches.
> 
> I think rebasing changes on top of pu is counterproductive. I believe
> that Junio had extra work rebasing your earlier series onto a merge
> of
> the minimum number of topics that it really depended on. There is no
> way
> that he could merge the branch in this form because it would imply
> merging all of pu.
> 
> See the zeroth section of SubmittingPatches [1] for the guidelines.

I'm a bit confused because 
[PATCH 18/21] get_default_remote(): remove unneeded flag variable

doesn't do anything on master -- it depends on some patch in pu.  And
we definitely want to pick up jk/check-repository-format (which doesn't
include whatever 18/21 depends on).

So what do you think our base should be?

  reply	other threads:[~2016-03-29 20:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-23 10:04 [PATCH 00/21] replacement for dt/refs-backend-lmdb v7 patch 04/33 Michael Haggerty
2016-03-23 10:04 ` [PATCH 01/21] t1430: test the output and error of some commands more carefully Michael Haggerty
2016-03-23 10:04 ` [PATCH 02/21] t1430: clean up broken refs/tags/shadow Michael Haggerty
2016-03-23 10:04 ` [PATCH 03/21] t1430: don't rely on symbolic-ref for creating broken symrefs Michael Haggerty
2016-03-23 10:04 ` [PATCH 04/21] t1430: test for-each-ref in the presence of badly-named refs Michael Haggerty
2016-03-23 10:04 ` [PATCH 05/21] t1430: improve test coverage of deletion " Michael Haggerty
2016-03-23 10:04 ` [PATCH 06/21] resolve_missing_loose_ref(): simplify semantics Michael Haggerty
2016-03-23 10:04 ` [PATCH 07/21] resolve_ref_unsafe(): use for loop to count up to MAXDEPTH Michael Haggerty
2016-03-23 10:04 ` [PATCH 08/21] resolve_ref_unsafe(): ensure flags is always set Michael Haggerty
2016-03-23 10:04 ` [PATCH 09/21] resolve_ref_1(): eliminate local variable Michael Haggerty
2016-03-23 10:04 ` [PATCH 10/21] resolve_ref_1(): reorder code Michael Haggerty
2016-03-23 10:04 ` [PATCH 11/21] resolve_ref_1(): eliminate local variable "bad_name" Michael Haggerty
2016-03-23 10:04 ` [PATCH 12/21] files-backend: break out ref reading Michael Haggerty
2016-03-23 10:04 ` [PATCH 13/21] read_raw_ref(): manage own scratch space Michael Haggerty
2016-03-23 10:04 ` [PATCH 14/21] Inline resolve_ref_1() into resolve_ref_unsafe() Michael Haggerty
2016-03-23 10:04 ` [PATCH 15/21] read_raw_ref(): change flags parameter to unsigned int Michael Haggerty
2016-03-23 10:04 ` [PATCH 16/21] fsck_head_link(): remove unneeded flag variable Michael Haggerty
2016-03-23 10:04 ` [PATCH 17/21] cmd_merge(): " Michael Haggerty
2016-03-23 10:04 ` [PATCH 18/21] get_default_remote(): " Michael Haggerty
2016-03-23 10:04 ` [PATCH 19/21] checkout_paths(): " Michael Haggerty
2016-03-23 10:04 ` [PATCH 20/21] check_aliased_update(): check that dst_name is non-NULL Michael Haggerty
2016-03-23 10:04 ` [PATCH 21/21] show_head_ref(): check the result of resolve_ref_namespace() Michael Haggerty
2016-03-24  6:47 ` [PATCH 00/21] replacement for dt/refs-backend-lmdb v7 patch 04/33 David Turner
2016-03-27  5:22   ` Michael Haggerty
2016-03-29 20:12     ` David Turner [this message]
2016-03-30  6:37       ` Michael Haggerty
2016-03-30 20:05         ` David Turner
2016-03-31 16:14           ` Michael Haggerty
2016-03-31 22:22             ` David Turner
2016-04-01  1:37           ` Stefan Beller
2016-04-01 17:55             ` David Turner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1459282370.2976.7.camel@twopensource.com \
    --to=dturner@twopensource.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=mhagger@alum.mit.edu \
    --cc=pclouds@gmail.com \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=ramsay@ramsayjones.plus.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).