From: santiago@nyu.edu
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>, Jeff King <peff@peff.net>,
Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>,
Santiago Torres <santiago@nyu.edu>
Subject: [PATCH v6 0/6] Move PGP verification out of verify-tag
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2016 18:26:55 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1460932021-27633-1-git-send-email-santiago@nyu.edu> (raw)
From: Santiago Torres <santiago@nyu.edu>
This is a follow up of [1], [2], [3], [4], and [5]. patches 1/6, 2/6 and 3/6
are the same as the corresponding commits in pu.
v6:
* As Junio suggested, updated 4/6, to include the name argument and the
ternary operator to provide more descriptive error messages. I propagated
these changes to 5/6 and 6/6 as well. I'm unsure about the 80-column
on 4/6, the ternary operator is rather long.
* Updated and reviewed the commit messages based on Eric and Junio's
feedback
v5:
Added helpful feedback by Eric
* Reordering of the patches, to avoid temporal inclusion of a regression
* Fix typos here and there.
* Review commit messages, as some weren't representative of what the patches
were doing anymore.
* Updated t7030 to include Peff's suggestion, and added a helped-by line here
as it was mostly Peff's code.
* Updated the error-handling/printing issues that were introduced when.
libifying the verify_tag function.
v4:
Thanks Eric, Jeff, and Hannes for the feedback.
* I relocated the sigchain_push call so it comes after the error on
gpg-interface (thanks Hannnes for catching this).
* I updated the unit test to match the discussion on [3]. Now it generates
the expected output of the tag on the fly for comparison. (This is just
copy and paste from [3], but I verified that it works by breaking the
while)
* I split moving the code and renaming the variables into two patches so
these are easier to review.
* I used an adapter on builtin/tag.c instead of redefining all the fn*
declarations everywhere. This introduces an issue with the way git tag -v
resolves refnames though. I added a new commit to restore the previous
behavior of git-tag. I'm not sure if I should've split this into two commits
though.
v3:
Thanks Eric, Jeff, for the feedback.
* I separated the patch in multiple sub-patches.
* I compared the behavior of previous git tag -v and git verify-tag
invocations to make sure the behavior is the same
* I dropped the multi-line comment, as suggested.
* I fixed the issue with the missing brackets in the while (this is
now detected by the test).
v2:
* I moved the pgp-verification code to tag.c
* I added extra arguments so git tag -v and git verify-tag both work
with the same function
* Relocated the SIGPIPE handling code in verify-tag to gpg-interface
v1:
The verify tag function is just a thin wrapper around the verify-tag
command. We can avoid one fork call by doing the verification inside
the tag builtin instead.
This applies on v2.8.0.
Thanks!
-Santiago
[1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/287649
[2] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/289836
[3] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/290608
[4] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/290731
[5] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/290790
Santiago Torres (6):
builtin/verify-tag.c: ignore SIGPIPE in gpg-interface
t7030: test verifying multiple tags
verify-tag: change variable name for readability
verify-tag: add sha1 argument to verify_tag()
verify-tag: move verification code to tag.c
tag -v: verfy directly rather than exec-ing verify-tag
builtin/tag.c | 8 +------
builtin/verify-tag.c | 64 ++++++++-------------------------------------------
gpg-interface.c | 2 ++
t/t7030-verify-tag.sh | 13 +++++++++++
tag.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
tag.h | 3 ++-
6 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)
--
2.8.0
next reply other threads:[~2016-04-17 22:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-17 22:26 santiago [this message]
2016-04-17 22:26 ` [PATCH v6 1/6] builtin/verify-tag.c: ignore SIGPIPE in gpg-interface santiago
2016-04-17 22:26 ` [PATCH v6 2/6] t7030: test verifying multiple tags santiago
2016-04-17 22:26 ` [PATCH v6 3/6] verify-tag: change variable name for readability santiago
2016-04-18 17:20 ` Eric Sunshine
2016-04-19 5:13 ` Jeff King
2016-04-17 22:26 ` [PATCH v6 4/6] verify-tag: add sha1 argument to verify_tag() santiago
2016-04-18 17:41 ` Eric Sunshine
2016-04-18 20:28 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-04-17 22:27 ` [PATCH v6 5/6] verify-tag: move verification code to tag.c santiago
2016-04-17 22:27 ` [PATCH v6 6/6] tag -v: verfy directly rather than exec-ing verify-tag santiago
2016-04-18 18:00 ` Eric Sunshine
2016-04-18 18:14 ` [PATCH v6 0/6] Move PGP verification out of verify-tag Eric Sunshine
2016-04-18 20:15 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-04-19 5:16 ` Jeff King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1460932021-27633-1-git-send-email-santiago@nyu.edu \
--to=santiago@nyu.edu \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
--cc=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).