From: Stephen Bash <bash@genarts.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Conrad Irwin <conrad.irwin@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Disallow creating ambiguous branch names by default
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 09:53:15 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <14776204.81375.1313675595871.JavaMail.root@mail.hq.genarts.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vhb5fev8a.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Junio C Hamano" <gitster@pobox.com>
> To: "Conrad Irwin" <conrad.irwin@gmail.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2011 2:41:41 PM
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Disallow creating ambiguous branch names by default
>
> We should be giving these warning messages immediately after creating
> potentially problematic refs, i.e. just after "git branch v1.0.0" and
> "git checkout -b v1.0.0". The user experience should look like this
> instead:
>
> $ git branch v1.0.0
> warning: refname 'v1.0.0' is ambiguous.
> advice: you may want to rename it to an unambigous name with
> advice: git branch -m v1.0.0 v1.0.0-branch
> $ git branch -m v1.0.0 v1.0.0-branch ;# thanks for an advice
>
> $ git checkout -b v1.0.0
> warning: refname 'v1.0.0' is ambiguous.
> advice: you may want to rename it to an unambigous name with
> advice: git branch -m v1.0.0-branch-2
> $ git branch -m v1.0.0-branch-2 ;# thanks for an advice
Should case insensitive matches be added to the tests? This morning I discovered coworkers working on branches foo and Foo thinking they were on the same branch... Rather trivial to clean up, but certainly caused some confusion in the office.
Thanks,
Stephen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-18 13:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-17 8:21 [PATCH] Disallow creating ambiguous branch names by default Conrad Irwin
2011-08-17 18:41 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-08-18 3:35 ` Vijay Lakshminarayanan
2011-08-18 13:53 ` Stephen Bash [this message]
2011-08-19 18:07 ` Conrad Irwin
2011-08-19 18:15 ` Stephen Bash
2011-08-19 18:14 ` Conrad Irwin
2011-08-19 20:49 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-08-19 21:07 ` Conrad Irwin
2011-08-19 21:52 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=14776204.81375.1313675595871.JavaMail.root@mail.hq.genarts.com \
--to=bash@genarts.com \
--cc=conrad.irwin@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).