From: Kaartic Sivaraam <kaarticsivaraam91196@gmail.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>, Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, sandals@crustytoothpaste.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wt-status.c: Modified status message shown for a parent-less branch
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 13:40:03 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1497255003.1718.1.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqzidg14xn.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
On Sat, 2017-06-10 at 20:02 +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Again, you said what I wanted to say in my review comment a lot
> better than I managed to say ;-)
>
> When the current message "Initial commit" is read in the context
> together with "Changes to be committed", etc., by users of "git
> commit" who do not use the "-m message" option, it is clear that
> these are talking about the commit the user is about to make.
>
> The confusion factor that triggered the discussion in the thread
> that resulted in this patch exists because the output from "git
> status" uses phrases that are designed to guide the user in working
> toward creating the next commit on the branch, even though the user
> may not be thinking in terms of "what would happen when I say
> 'commit' now?"
>
> And I do not think the potential confusion is limited to "Initial
> commit" from that point of view. The files listed in "Changes to be
> committed" list are not files to be "committed", UNLESS the user is
> aware that s/he is asking "what would happen when I say 'commit'
> now?". When the question is "what is the status of my working
> area?",
> that phrase in the section header is suboptimal.
>
> Adding a bit to "struct wt_status" is a good first step to allow all
> three (i.e. in addition to "Initial commit" and "Changes to be
> committed", "Changes not staged for commit" is the other one that
> shares this potential confusion factor) to be phrased in a way that
> is more appropriate in an answer to the question "what is the status
> of my working area?", I would think.
>
> Thanks.
>
It seems that the current change has to be discarded altogether and
further the change required doesn't look trivial. This seems to warrant
some bit of research of the code base. As a first step I would like to
know which part of the code base creates the commit template. I guess
much can't be done without knowing how it's created.
--
Regards,
Kaartic Sivaraam <kaarticsivaraam91196@gmail.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-12 8:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-10 1:52 [PATCH] wt-status.c: Modified status message shown for a parent-less branch Kaartic Sivaraam
2017-06-10 2:10 ` Kaartic Sivaraam
2017-06-10 2:23 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-06-10 8:44 ` Kaartic Sivaraam
2017-06-10 9:36 ` Kaartic Sivaraam
2017-06-10 10:21 ` Jeff King
2017-06-10 11:02 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-06-12 8:10 ` Kaartic Sivaraam [this message]
2017-06-12 18:28 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-06-12 21:20 ` Jeff King
2017-06-12 21:31 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-06-12 21:37 ` Jeff King
2017-06-15 8:19 ` Kaartic Sivaraam
2017-06-15 8:42 ` Jeff King
2017-06-15 11:43 ` Samuel Lijin
2017-06-15 13:12 ` Jeff King
2017-06-16 10:36 ` Kaartic Sivaraam
2017-06-16 10:50 ` Jeff King
2017-06-18 7:35 ` [PATCH/Almost final] " Kaartic Sivaraam
2017-06-18 7:53 ` [PATCH/ALMOST FINAL] Contextually notify user about an initial commit Kaartic Sivaraam
2017-06-18 8:34 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2017-06-19 2:41 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Kaartic Sivaraam
2017-06-19 2:44 ` [PATCH 2/2] Add test for the new status message Kaartic Sivaraam
2017-06-19 4:32 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-06-19 17:59 ` Kaartic Sivaraam
2017-06-19 18:04 ` Jeff King
2017-06-19 18:33 ` Kaartic Sivaraam
2017-06-19 4:29 ` [PATCH 1/2] Contextually notify user about an initial commit Junio C Hamano
2017-06-19 2:41 ` [PATCH 2/2] Add test for the new status message Kaartic Sivaraam
2017-06-19 9:10 ` [PATCH/ALMOST FINAL] Contextually notify user about an initial commit Jeff King
2017-06-19 13:24 ` Kaartic Sivaraam
2017-06-19 15:47 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-06-20 3:02 ` [PATCH 1/3] " Kaartic Sivaraam
2017-06-20 3:02 ` [PATCH 2/3] Update test(s) that used old status message Kaartic Sivaraam
2017-06-20 3:02 ` [PATCH 3/3] Add tests for the contextual initial " Kaartic Sivaraam
2017-06-20 7:26 ` [PATCH 1/3] Contextually notify user about an initial commit Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2017-06-20 13:37 ` Kaartic Sivaraam
2017-06-20 14:41 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2017-06-21 2:34 ` Kaartic Sivaraam
2017-06-21 2:37 ` [PATCH/FINAL] status: contextually " Kaartic Sivaraam
2017-06-21 14:35 ` Kaartic Sivaraam
2017-06-21 14:52 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2017-06-21 17:45 ` Kaartic Sivaraam
2017-06-21 18:45 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-06-21 18:16 ` Kaartic Sivaraam
2017-06-22 2:10 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-06-22 3:01 ` Kaartic Sivaraam
2017-06-10 14:44 ` [PATCH] wt-status.c: Modified status message shown for a parent-less branch Philip Oakley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1497255003.1718.1.camel@gmail.com \
--to=kaarticsivaraam91196@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
--cc=sandals@crustytoothpaste.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).