From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Rosen Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] show: obey --textconv for blobs Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 17:37:40 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <1547528401.1826118.1366645060312.JavaMail.root@openwide.fr> References: <20130422152905.GA11886@sigill.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Michael J Gruber , git@vger.kernel.org, Junio C Hamano To: Jeff King X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Apr 22 17:37:48 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UUIoL-00080C-Vj for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 17:37:46 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754595Ab3DVPhm (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Apr 2013 11:37:42 -0400 Received: from zimbra3.corp.accelance.fr ([213.162.49.233]:46586 "EHLO zimbra3.corp.accelance.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754533Ab3DVPhl (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Apr 2013 11:37:41 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra3.corp.accelance.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9AFF28006; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 17:37:40 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zimbra3.corp.accelance.fr Received: from zimbra3.corp.accelance.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra3.corp.accelance.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mlffJg-2AfLX; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 17:37:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from zimbra2.corp.accelance.fr (zimbra2.corp.accelance.fr [213.162.49.232]) by zimbra3.corp.accelance.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6906C28002; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 17:37:40 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <20130422152905.GA11886@sigill.intra.peff.net> X-Originating-IP: [213.162.49.238] X-Mailer: Zimbra 7.2.2_GA_2852 (ZimbraWebClient - GC26 (Linux)/7.2.2_GA_2852) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: > > git show --textconv HEAD~4:binary-gob | less > > > > but I doubt it is a good idea to turn it on by default this late in > > the game. > > Exactly. I certainly do not mind it as an option, and I am on the > fence > regarding it as a default (I think it might have been a sane thing to > do > from the start, but at this point the change-of-behavior makes me > hesitate). So I am perfectly willing to go either way, depending on > what > others think. > some features detect if they are piping to a terminal... couldn't we do something like that ?