From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Rosen Subject: Re: first parent, commit graph layout, and pull merge direction Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 12:07:52 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <1639906933.2666673.1369303672919.JavaMail.root@openwide.fr> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org, Andreas Krey To: John Szakmeister X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu May 23 12:07:59 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UfSRC-0006j7-O8 for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Thu, 23 May 2013 12:07:59 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757975Ab3EWKHz (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 May 2013 06:07:55 -0400 Received: from zimbra3.corp.accelance.fr ([213.162.49.233]:54035 "EHLO zimbra3.corp.accelance.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757935Ab3EWKHy (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 May 2013 06:07:54 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra3.corp.accelance.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF1A1280A6; Thu, 23 May 2013 12:07:53 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zimbra3.corp.accelance.fr Received: from zimbra3.corp.accelance.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra3.corp.accelance.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DjJ2f9bl0r4L; Thu, 23 May 2013 12:07:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from zimbra2.corp.accelance.fr (zimbra2.corp.accelance.fr [213.162.49.232]) by zimbra3.corp.accelance.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AD12280A1; Thu, 23 May 2013 12:07:53 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: X-Originating-IP: [213.162.49.238] X-Mailer: Zimbra 7.2.2_GA_2852 (ZimbraWebClient - GC27 (Linux)/7.2.2_GA_2852) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: ----- Mail original ----- > On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 5:06 AM, Andreas Krey wrote: > [snip] > > ... > >> Don't do that, then. > > > > :-) Problem is, in this case 'I' expands to about > > 1<<7 people I need to educate on this. > > This is a feature of `git pull` that I really despise. I really wish > `git pull` treated the remote as the first parent in its merge > operation. > seconded... github's network pages (which display the commit graph of projects) seems to follow the "first parent at the top" rule and the pull merges are standing out as "wrong" because of that...