From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
To: Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: git-rev-list problem with --max-age and --merge-order
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 22:39:50 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <17073.29462.564422.743677@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> (raw)
I have a version of gitk that draws stuff more-or-less as it receives
it from git-rev-list -- it reorders the commits somewhat but it
doesn't need to wait for the end of the output from git-rev-list
before it can draw anything. To do that it passes --merge-order to
git-rev-list and relies on the property that parents will be listed
after all of their children.
I also want to make the default be to show the commits for the last 30
days. However, using --max-age with --merge-order outputs many fewer
commits than I get if I use the same --max-age argument without
--merge-order. For example, on the current linux-2.6 git tree,
git-rev-tree --max-age=1116330140 HEAD outputs 655 commits, whereas
git-rev-tree --merge-order --max-age=1116330140 HEAD only outputs 173
commits. That date is 2005-05-17 21:42:20 in my timezone, about 30
days ago. An example of a commit that isn't output with --merge-order
is 1e86d1c648508fd50e6c9960576b87906a7906ad:
Author: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> 2005-06-02 14:11:37
Committer: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@ppc970.osdl.org> 2005-06-03 01:19:27
[PATCH] ppc64: Fix result code handling in prom_init
Any ideas why using --merge-order means we don't see this one? It's
certainly less than 30 days old.
Thanks,
Paul.
next reply other threads:[~2005-06-16 12:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-06-16 12:39 Paul Mackerras [this message]
[not found] ` <2cfc40320506160745411858f1@mail.gmail.com>
2005-06-16 16:06 ` git-rev-list problem with --max-age and --merge-order Jon Seymour
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=17073.29462.564422.743677@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com \
--to=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jon.seymour@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).