From: Bill Lear <rael@zopyra.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: 'git checkout -f' versus 'git reset --hard'
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 08:36:09 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <17940.64329.10165.993967@lisa.zopyra.com> (raw)
After a failed merge, I want to undo things. I typically use git
reset --hard, and it works like a charm. Others have tried to use git
checkout -f, but I have cautioned that git reset --hard is really the
way to do it. Is there a difference here, or are they equivalent?
Bill
next reply other threads:[~2007-04-05 13:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-05 13:36 Bill Lear [this message]
2007-04-05 13:43 ` 'git checkout -f' versus 'git reset --hard' Jeff King
2007-04-05 15:29 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-04-05 15:43 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=17940.64329.10165.993967@lisa.zopyra.com \
--to=rael@zopyra.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).