From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Mackerras Subject: Re: [Gitk Patch 0/6] Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 13:44:30 +1100 Message-ID: <18672.4878.128010.174357@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> References: <1223532590-8706-1-git-send-email-robin.rosenberg@dewire.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Robin Rosenberg X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Oct 11 04:47:52 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KoUVr-0002d4-Oi for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sat, 11 Oct 2008 04:47:28 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753734AbYJKCqN (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Oct 2008 22:46:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753896AbYJKCqN (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Oct 2008 22:46:13 -0400 Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.10.76.45]:41068 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753734AbYJKCqL (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Oct 2008 22:46:11 -0400 Received: by ozlabs.org (Postfix, from userid 1003) id 77010DE188; Sat, 11 Oct 2008 13:46:08 +1100 (EST) In-Reply-To: <1223532590-8706-1-git-send-email-robin.rosenberg@dewire.com> X-Mailer: VM 8.0.9 under Emacs 22.2.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Robin Rosenberg writes: > (This is a resend to include gitk maintainer Paul Mackerras) Thanks. > I finally got tired of pressing Alt and some letter to activate menus in Gitk. > For example in "any" program you can press Alt-F to have the File menu drop > down and then select the underscored character to select the wanted menu. > > This series makes it possible. Friends of TCL may think my solution is too > hack-ish. It doesn't fix all of the similary problem (mostly button) but > that is the subject of later patches as it looks like it requires other > means. It'll do for a first cut, but there would be a nicer way to do it, I think. Also, I think patches 2 and 4 should be combined into one, as should patches 5 and 6. I'll do that and apply the series as 4 commits, unless you have an objection. Paul.