Re: git object-count differs between clones

[Andrew Martin <amartin@xes-inc.com>]

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jeff King" <peff@peff.net>
> To: "Andrew Martin" <amartin@xes-inc.com>
> Cc: "Matthieu Moy" <Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp.fr>, git@vger.kernel.org
> Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 2016 10:52:46 AM
> Subject: Re: git object-count differs between clones
> 
> On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 10:21:17AM -0600, Andrew Martin wrote:
> 
> > > You may try expiring your reflog and "git gc" again.
> > 
> > Thanks, I found some commits that are not referenced in any branch. How can
> > I
> > remove these from the reflog? I tried running
> > "git reflog expire --expire=now --expire-unreachable=now --all" followed by
> > "git gc" but still the same number of objects remain.
> 
> Are the objects now loose, or still in packs? Git has a grace period for
> pruning objects, so that we do not delete objects for an in-progress
> operation. The life cycle of an unreferenced object should be something
> like:
> 
>   - reachable by reflogs, which are pruned after 30 days (or
>     gc.reflogExpireUnreachable config). Objects will be repacked as
>     normal during this time. Override with "reflog expire" as you did
>     above.
> 
>   - after the reflog expires, the objects are now unreachable. During
>     the next repack, they'll be ejected from the pack into loose
>     objects, and their mtimes set to match the pack they came from
>     (which is probably quite recent if you just repacked!).
> 
>   - after 2 weeks (or gc.pruneExpire), unreachable loose objects are
>     dropped by "git prune", which is called as part of "git gc". This is
>     based on the object mtime.
> 
>     You can accelerate this with "git gc --prune=now" (or
>     "--prune=5.minutes.ago").
> 
> -Peff

Jeff,

Thanks for the clarification. I now ran "git repack -A" followed by 
"git gc --prune=now", however I am still seeing the same number of objects. What
else can I try to successfully mark these and unreachable and garbage collect them?

Thanks,

Andrew