From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.manjaro.org (mail.manjaro.org [116.203.91.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 860098F4A for ; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 21:09:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=116.203.91.91 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713388149; cv=none; b=hzedcCU1sn/FgLixTPLNsOJ8e2CcFWzbN4IPPe7SmmAfmuFUySqiPk22lZYYAD3en/wMxoDZWSHd723Jq5QT+Pf8SRX8+nBKLQRMMyuH0uq+J3g7MaoMLm4Ok3RyEi9N5/HN95wVKufdp1CRCm6tvaIGsIB8vcGjUSdEw2x4GgQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713388149; c=relaxed/simple; bh=x0YJ1y6uw7EuaQ/8mF3jUrsOISjvpnXdmrwekjOWrjI=; h=MIME-Version:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References: Message-ID:Content-Type; b=AUXb3qjFfagm7jRXQwY6vmqAK36DxwRUK/dKg1EjS5jvvfk6ebPoBzCbvmLRawo4E1HNZuzkdfN+kpc3iNko731wu5PeLIQv8scD0jXyZRCjIUHwEyeX4cDWoh3iOfRQe/CUs1PN6+D1+qUGihUxmwm45LQC7JVapplN1mzGcBw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=manjaro.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=manjaro.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=manjaro.org header.i=@manjaro.org header.b=hRTxgA5r; arc=none smtp.client-ip=116.203.91.91 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=manjaro.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=manjaro.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=manjaro.org header.i=@manjaro.org header.b="hRTxgA5r" Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=manjaro.org; s=2021; t=1713388143; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=d/UBFcegjRaD2tlnsEFr7M7FutXqUljKKMWA6Cc2flA=; b=hRTxgA5romWEzQ4+zr8vYRfG9PUqpThtg+j7KPvADreNYvYd8DB1aByfOJq36MsrGRNzb/ nQTo2Uc7+Q/18/wlYcGXotSsSiMibe8TCS7NmYieJeqp8p9Qkiw36mLBdYYyW84201cfzc tiAOkBlPBOO2mToM/gql43GNUzjFcO7yhJ2/EagUPDORDTUvS3ZZf/hQDeWEf3+a7mi30k FQ/YW3rP5vJeyHu21GcXFrjGNQUIX+k9lBgmTtOJ/J3/y2KFYIndnRTb/mLAScVP00hMxO 0LLfkxYwYWbxtUmeJXDe9nIydW2b1Fe/oiG8wr9yztzW9X2+OLFG2HMmCf+fJg== Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 23:09:03 +0200 From: Dragan Simic To: Junio C Hamano Cc: Phillip Wood , git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] format-patch: new --resend option for adding "RESEND" to patch subjects In-Reply-To: References: <1d9c6ce3df714211889453c245485d46b43edff6.1713324598.git.dsimic@manjaro.org> <154b085c-3e92-4eb6-b6a6-97aa02f8f07d@gmail.com> Message-ID: <19d5f3d4c99fc1da24c80ac2a9ee8bf8@manjaro.org> X-Sender: dsimic@manjaro.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Authentication-Results: ORIGINATING; auth=pass smtp.auth=dsimic@manjaro.org smtp.mailfrom=dsimic@manjaro.org On 2024-04-17 23:03, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Dragan Simic writes: > >> With all due respect, "--rfc=WIP" looks like a kludge, simply >> because "--rfc" should, IIUC, be some kind of a fixed shorthand. > > I wouldn't use "should" there. In any case, we are not going to add > unbounded number of --wip, --resend, etc., on top of what we have > already. Introducing --something={WIP,RESEND,RFC,HACK,...} and > deprecating --rfc is not something I would object to, though. Good to know, thanks. I'll drop the patches that add "--resend" as a new command-line option, and I'll think a bit about the solution you described as acceptable.