From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pirate Praveen Subject: Re: t7300-clean.sh fails "not ok 32 - should avoid cleaning possible submodules" on debian jessie Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2016 21:50:06 +0530 Message-ID: <1A6C20FA-43F0-43AF-B38D-E88EE760F96F@debian.org> References: <5756856A.4020406@debian.org> <5756C6F4.5050300@debian.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Johannes Schindelin , "git@vger.kernel.org" To: Stefan Beller X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Jun 07 18:30:00 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bAJk7-0006Yj-2z for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Tue, 07 Jun 2016 18:20:39 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161774AbcFGQUa convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jun 2016 12:20:30 -0400 Received: from sub5.mail.dreamhost.com ([208.113.200.129]:38527 "EHLO homiemail-a94.g.dreamhost.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753983AbcFGQU1 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jun 2016 12:20:27 -0400 Received: from homiemail-a94.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a94.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F9D238A059; Tue, 7 Jun 2016 09:20:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (unknown [14.97.231.184]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: me@j4v4m4n.in) by homiemail-a94.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4D79538A058; Tue, 7 Jun 2016 09:20:23 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On 2016, =E0=B4=9C=E0=B5=82=E0=B5=BA 7 9:16:01 PM IST, Stefan Beller wrote: >On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 8:43 AM, Stefan Beller >wrote: >> (Are you telling me that patch is faulty?) > >The patch is not part of v2.8.1 but part of v2.8.3, >so take a later version, or cherry-pick that patch manually. Thanks! I have ignored that test failure for now. Good to know its fixe= d in 2.8.3.