From: "Tor Arvid Lund" <torarvid@gmail.com>
To: dhruva <dhruva@ymail.com>
Cc: "Junio C Hamano" <gitster@pobox.com>,
"David Brown" <git@davidb.org>, "GIT SCM" <git@vger.kernel.org>,
"Simon Hausmann" <simon@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Optional shrinking of RCS keywords in git-p4
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 17:27:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1a6be5fa0809150827y6d52e240m24fd463549bd4971@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <263224.61965.qm@web95002.mail.in2.yahoo.com>
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 1:46 PM, dhruva <dhruva@ymail.com> wrote:
> ----- Original Message ----
>> From: Tor Arvid Lund <torarvid@gmail.com>
------ >8 ------
>> Hmm.. I thought this was not a p4 problem. I think however, that
>> "git-p4 submit" tries to do git format-patch and then git apply that
>> patch to the p4 directory. In other words, I believe that git apply
>> fails since the file in the p4 dir has the keywords expanded, while
>> the patch does not. I haven't done any careful investigation, but If
>> my assumption is true, it sounds like dhruvas patch should work...
>
> Your assumption is true (from my understanding of the code). My doubt is, even the files in p4 folder will be from git with no RCS keyword expanded. The patch application must ideally be clean! I am confused here.
Hmm, regarding the p4 folder - I'm pretty sure git-p4 calls "p4 sync
<depotpath>/..." in that folder before applying the patch. So those
files are whatever p4 says they are - which is with keywords
expanded...
-TAL-
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-15 15:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-15 11:46 [PATCH] Optional shrinking of RCS keywords in git-p4 dhruva
2008-09-15 15:27 ` Tor Arvid Lund [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-09-19 2:56 dhruva
2008-09-16 13:33 dhruva
2008-09-16 4:53 dhruva
2008-09-16 17:26 ` Daniel Barkalow
2008-09-16 2:51 dhruva
2008-09-15 7:21 dhruva
2008-09-15 6:31 dhruva
2008-09-15 6:26 dhruva
2008-09-15 6:35 ` David Brown
2008-09-15 7:43 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-09-15 11:02 ` Tor Arvid Lund
2008-09-15 19:22 ` Daniel Barkalow
2008-09-16 4:12 ` David Brown
2008-09-16 12:58 ` Jing Xue
2008-09-16 17:12 ` Daniel Barkalow
2008-09-16 17:32 ` Daniel Barkalow
2008-09-15 5:58 Dhruva Krishnamurthy
2008-09-15 6:09 ` David Brown
2008-09-15 6:17 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1a6be5fa0809150827y6d52e240m24fd463549bd4971@mail.gmail.com \
--to=torarvid@gmail.com \
--cc=dhruva@ymail.com \
--cc=git@davidb.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=simon@lst.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).