From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Carlos Rica" Subject: Re: [PATCH] Port git-tag.sh to C. Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2007 00:36:38 +0200 Message-ID: <1b46aba20706081536p6511e561x9a3134b1af1cb0a@mail.gmail.com> References: <1181338730800-git-send-email-krh@redhat.com> <1181340320.30683.30.camel@hinata.boston.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: "Johannes Schindelin" , git@vger.kernel.org To: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Kristian_H=F8gsberg?=" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Jun 09 00:37:00 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Hwn4l-00061j-SH for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sat, 09 Jun 2007 00:37:00 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030771AbXFHWgk convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Jun 2007 18:36:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S968710AbXFHWgk (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Jun 2007 18:36:40 -0400 Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.181]:12198 "EHLO wa-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S969549AbXFHWgi convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Jun 2007 18:36:38 -0400 Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id v27so1240737wah for ; Fri, 08 Jun 2007 15:36:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=f/7AbtnfjqCG6yLHPjBnnK2x9lMfb8r7nHhJzbp/DKHbiZeMIV+12lcavUdcJhrhMaaFwLNY9J56+I8sS3qvy8fYoxIK+aMdf/S5rkCpkT9c7R4+p2mkLX/Q2nWjKTmumH/Xvdy33g5pgUCeav1gj4BUEC/XuGlImXbKBcti/5k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=i9igOqEJvl+h/bwv26csCDyn9wPG4znPrzcvYkLp58WtlHLER00bhxf0jTMa5zDifgVOOQ6dhB6FgCA8FO0gm0cwRKbInC3YKKvFT0iOvdnDGWfBOxE+pCFE6lEuUe6AqHJR3V56vfqjQGnmmZm4K8qCkvyf+gxLSGpXlSnbQpE= Received: by 10.115.61.1 with SMTP id o1mr2998564wak.1181342198212; Fri, 08 Jun 2007 15:36:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.57.10 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Jun 2007 15:36:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1181340320.30683.30.camel@hinata.boston.redhat.com> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: 2007/6/9, Kristian H=F8gsberg : > Ugh, yeah... wasted effort... I didn't see anything about the SoC > project on the list and I didn't pre-announce my work because I only > spent little more than half a day... Sorry, it should have been announced before this could happen. > > As it happens, I am working with jasam on exactly the same script. We were doing a conservative work to get exactly the same options and behaviour that git-tag.sh does. The work is now almost finished, so you could help us comparing the two versions to see how could end with a better git-tag. It would be fantastic if we could point what parts of my code can be enhanced with those of yours. My test suite can also be run against the git-tag.sh code now, you can check check your code with it. Feel free to say everything you want about it! Carlos