From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matt Graham Subject: Re: Best CI Server for Git? Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 19:42:13 -0500 Message-ID: <1c5969370902021642v4e8d93djd22d5caa4aa9d1a9@mail.gmail.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Tim Visher X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Feb 03 01:44:01 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LU9OP-0006AP-QN for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 03 Feb 2009 01:43:58 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758855AbZBCAmR convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Feb 2009 19:42:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755489AbZBCAmR (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Feb 2009 19:42:17 -0500 Received: from mail-bw0-f12.google.com ([209.85.218.12]:58893 "EHLO mail-bw0-f12.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758675AbZBCAmP convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Feb 2009 19:42:15 -0500 Received: by bwz5 with SMTP id 5so1622380bwz.13 for ; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 16:42:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=G6qznK8inuwWONEqF3luLTIDYlLtIsb0/fS+N/Q0ld4=; b=nlkJ7Lq64NZ1pdkqGF/fYIvLK2Pum9f7bHQOxRSe6SHBZGMBy89Cp/x0G0WV1DalGR JlQLgg/bK5CoffhTx5CocCahRAPo59ASpCJVMHRgCC/qYJ78wlNXHACyMmfmcvLixIH+ F986c2m9ubK40t4Q+LiXOtjLMZg1zGkWKfvLY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Sf5hkdPE+QDN+Nt4BdsdmPjf43IbhDSIeLygg/ARuxl8JcWxppa8P7LH2jQIOIRRkW l72TU9zVzDQSx07j0Lng6kWDfp/CozJz7RGAnIO7EeCJ/wxHVAahHMTircnpLJCvSjvK fAdyH0UV2K3WRi9OzUJwEI9OdaMPYgJpMEROs= Received: by 10.223.106.68 with SMTP id w4mr601291fao.19.1233621733613; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 16:42:13 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 15:58, Tim Visher wrote: > I'm setting up a CI environment for my team and I'm wondering what CI > Server works best with Git. I'm actively considering Hudson and > Cruise Control and I'm leaning towards Hudson because of a demo I saw > Andrew Glover do at my local JUG. It looks like it's not really > 'officially' supported in either tool=E2=80=A6 Hudson leaves a fair amount to be implemented by plug-ins, so not being installed out of the box doesn't really imply bad. I would say that there are more significant differences between Hudson and Cruise Control than how they integrate with Git. We are currently switching from Cruise Control to Hudson for reasons related to ease of use. Here is another hudson/git plugin. It may not be quite as official but addresses issues people have had with the more official one: http://github.com/stephenh/hudson-git2