git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: jean-luc malet <jeanluc.malet@gmail.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Jay Soffian <jaysoffian@gmail.com>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] builtin-merge: add support for default merge options
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 15:19:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1de9d39c1003190719q10b2f019u3d4f148b9feb587d@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1de9d39c0903071131pdb2b125hce7c49642843c9f8@mail.gmail.com>

Hi!
I would like to know the status about this patch...
I think this is a useful feature to have a default configuration
settable for all branch.<name>.* options
thanks and regards
JLM

On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 8:31 PM, jean-luc malet <jeanluc.malet@gmail.com> wrote:
> as a user,
> 1) I looked how to override defaults, since merge seems to use --ff as
> default, I looked if there was any global config to override that.
> nothing found... so go back to google
> 2) I found on the web that we can set it using
> branch.branchname.mergeoptions so I said "what if I use a branch named
> *, the config file was correct and git didn't insult me so.... but not
> the expected result...
>
> since the commands have allready defaults builtin, why not storing
> thoses defaults in the config file? like this it's easier to update
> them or change the way git behave....
> JLM
>
> On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 8:18 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
>> Jay Soffian <jaysoffian@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 7:58 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
>>>> I think it would be much better if you did not introduce a new
>>>> configuration merge.options which is not consistent with everything else
>>>> to begin with.
>>>>
>>>> Instead, if your addition was literally to allow saying things like this,
>>>> it would be much easier to understand.
>>>>
>>>>        [branch "*"]
>>>>                mergeoptions = ...
>>>>                remote = origin
>>>>                rebase = true
>>>
>>> Okay. That's probably a more invasive patch, because a lot more code
>>> paths look at [branch ...], but I'll look into it.
>>
>> Note that you do not have to cover branch.*.remote and other things in the
>> same patch.  The first one could just handle branch.*.mergeoptions and you
>> can let later patches to implement the fallbacks for other variables.
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> KISS! (Keep It Simple, Stupid!)
> (garde le simple, imbécile!)
> "mais qu'est-ce que tu m'as pondu comme usine à gaz? fait des choses
> simples et qui marchent, espèce d'imbécile!"
> -----------------------------
> "Si vous pensez que vous êtes trop petit pour changer quoique ce soit,
> essayez donc de dormir avec un moustique dans votre chambre." Betty
> Reese
> http://www.grainesdechangement.com/citations.htm
>



-- 
KISS! (Keep It Simple, Stupid!)
(garde le simple, imbécile!)
"mais qu'est-ce que tu m'as pondu comme usine à gaz? fait des choses
simples et qui marchent, espèce d'imbécile!"
-----------------------------
"Si vous pensez que vous êtes trop petit pour changer quoique ce soit,
essayez donc de dormir avec un moustique dans votre chambre." Betty
Reese
http://www.grainesdechangement.com/citations.htm

  reply	other threads:[~2010-03-19 14:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-06 22:15 [PATCH 0/3] Re: how to have --no-ff be the default for all branch Jay Soffian
2009-03-06 22:15 ` [PATCH 1/3] config: add git_config_option_string() Jay Soffian
2009-03-06 22:15   ` [PATCH 2/3] builtin-merge: refactor to use git_config_option_string Jay Soffian
2009-03-06 22:15     ` [PATCH 3/3] builtin-merge: add support for default merge options Jay Soffian
2009-03-06 22:46       ` Junio C Hamano
2009-03-06 23:16         ` Jay Soffian
2009-03-07  0:44           ` [PATCH v2 " Jay Soffian
2009-03-07  0:58           ` [PATCH " Junio C Hamano
2009-03-07  1:56             ` Jay Soffian
2009-03-07  7:18               ` Junio C Hamano
2009-03-07 13:48                 ` Jay Soffian
2009-03-07 19:31                 ` jean-luc malet
2010-03-19 14:19                   ` jean-luc malet [this message]
2010-03-19 14:54                     ` Jay Soffian
2010-04-02 17:19                       ` jean-luc malet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1de9d39c1003190719q10b2f019u3d4f148b9feb587d@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=jeanluc.malet@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=jaysoffian@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).