From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Jackson Subject: Re: Remove need to untrack before tracking new branch Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 23:42:31 -0700 Organization: SGI Message-ID: <20050414234231.663fd7b3.pj@engr.sgi.com> References: <20050412132307.GH22614@pasky.ji.cz> <20050413092656.GO16489@pasky.ji.cz> <1113394537.23299.51.camel@nosferatu.lan> <20050413221936.GI25711@pasky.ji.cz> <1113461754.23299.68.camel@nosferatu.lan> <1113467335.23299.77.camel@nosferatu.lan> <1113467905.23299.81.camel@nosferatu.lan> <20050414091106.GX25711@pasky.ji.cz> <1113471609.23299.95.camel@nosferatu.lan> <1113472557.23299.99.camel@nosferatu.lan> <81b0412b0504141535793cc235@mail.gmail.com> <1113543914.23299.151.camel@nosferatu.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: raa.lkml@gmail.com, pasky@ucw.cz, git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Apr 15 08:42:03 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([12.107.209.244]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DMKW5-0000ht-Os for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Fri, 15 Apr 2005 08:41:26 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261748AbVDOGor (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Apr 2005 02:44:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261747AbVDOGor (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Apr 2005 02:44:47 -0400 Received: from omx2-ext.sgi.com ([192.48.171.19]:12011 "EHLO omx2.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261750AbVDOGol (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Apr 2005 02:44:41 -0400 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by omx2.sgi.com (8.12.11/8.12.9/linux-outbound_gateway-1.1) with ESMTP id j3F8MUh4018491; Fri, 15 Apr 2005 01:22:40 -0700 Received: from vpn2 (mtv-vpn-hw-pj-2.corp.sgi.com [134.15.25.219]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (SGI-8.12.5/8.12.5) with SMTP id j3F6gZlU14719713; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 23:42:36 -0700 (PDT) To: azarah@nosferatu.za.org In-Reply-To: <1113543914.23299.151.camel@nosferatu.lan> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.0 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org > No, '&' have a higher priority (weight?) than '&&'. & has a higher precedence than && C Operator Precedence and Associativity http://www.difranco.net/cop2220/op-prec.htm and many others -- google for 'c operator precedence' Where the bitops &, | and ^ bite you is that they are lower precedence than many other ops, including '=='. -- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson 1.650.933.1373, 1.925.600.0401