From: Martin Uecker <muecker@gmx.de>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: space compression (again)
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2005 19:37:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050416173702.GA12605@macavity> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0504161101470.29343@cag.csail.mit.edu>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1895 bytes --]
On Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 11:11:00AM -0400, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Apr 2005, Martin Uecker wrote:
>
> >The right thing (TM) is to switch from SHA1 of compressed
> >content for the complete monolithic file to a merkle hash tree
> >of the uncompressed content. This would make the hash
> >independent of the actual storage method (chunked or not).
>
> It would certainly be nice to change to a hash of the uncompressed
> content, rather than a hash of the compressed content, but it's not
> strictly necessary, since files are fetched all at once: there's not 'read
> subrange' operation on blobs.
>
> I assume 'merkle hash tree' is talking about:
> http://www.open-content.net/specs/draft-jchapweske-thex-02.html
> ..which is very interesting, but not quite what I was thinking.
> The merkle hash approach seems to require fixed chunk boundaries.
I don't know what is written there, but I don't
consider fixed chunk boundaries part of the definition.
> The rsync approach does not use fixed chunk boundaries; this is necessary
> to ensure good storage reuse for the expected case (ie; inserting a single
> line at the start or in the middle of the file, which changes all the
> chunk boundaries).
Yes. The chunk boundaries should be determined deterministically
from local properties of the data. Use a rolling checksum over
some small window and split the file it it hits a special value (0).
This is what the rsyncable patch to zlib does.
> Further, in the absence of subrange reads on blobs, it's not entirely
> clear what using a merkle hash would buy you.
The whole design of git is a hash tree. If you extend
this tree structure into files you end up with merkle
hash trees. Everything else is just more complicated.
Martin
--
One night, when little Giana from Milano was fast asleep,
she had a strange dream.
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-16 17:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-04-15 17:19 space compression (again) C. Scott Ananian
2005-04-15 18:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-15 18:45 ` C. Scott Ananian
2005-04-15 19:00 ` Derek Fawcus
2005-04-15 19:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-16 14:39 ` Martin Uecker
2005-04-16 15:11 ` C. Scott Ananian
2005-04-16 17:37 ` Martin Uecker [this message]
2005-04-19 12:39 ` Martin Uecker
2005-04-15 18:50 ` Derek Fawcus
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-04-15 19:33 Ray Heasman
2005-04-16 12:29 ` David Lang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050416173702.GA12605@macavity \
--to=muecker@gmx.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).