From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use libcurl to use HTTP to get repositories Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2005 06:55:59 +0200 Message-ID: <20050417045559.GA769@elte.hu> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Barkalow X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Apr 17 06:53:13 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([12.107.209.244]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DN1mN-0005Pa-Sy for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sun, 17 Apr 2005 06:53:08 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261260AbVDQE4p (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Apr 2005 00:56:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261259AbVDQE4p (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Apr 2005 00:56:45 -0400 Received: from mx2.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:21380 "EHLO mx2.elte.hu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261257AbVDQE4g (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Apr 2005 00:56:36 -0400 Received: from chiara.elte.hu (chiara.elte.hu [157.181.150.200]) by mx2.elte.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AF7D3184BC; Sun, 17 Apr 2005 06:55:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: by chiara.elte.hu (Postfix, from userid 17806) id 197BC1FC2; Sun, 17 Apr 2005 06:56:02 +0200 (CEST) To: Linus Torvalds Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-ELTE-SpamVersion: MailScanner 4.31.6-itk1 (ELTE 1.2) SpamAssassin 2.63 ClamAV 0.73 X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-4.9, required 5.9, autolearn=not spam, BAYES_00 -4.90 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamScore: -4 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org * Daniel Barkalow wrote: > Still leaks a bit of memory due to bug copied from read-tree. Linus, should i resend the 18 fixes i sent the other day? (as a GIT repository perhaps?) I found roughly 6 common memory leaks, 8 theoretical memory leaks, 2 overflows and did a couple of cleanups. One of the patches [the cache collision related thing] we agreed was not needed, the rest is still very much valid i think. I did some basic testing with the fixes applied, nothing seemed to break in any visible way in these tests. Ingo