From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Jackson Subject: Re: optimize gitdiff-do script Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 12:17:56 -0700 Organization: SGI Message-ID: <20050418121756.2a4b6e2e.pj@sgi.com> References: <20050416232749.23430.93360.sendpatchset@sam.engr.sgi.com> <20050416232810.23430.78712.sendpatchset@sam.engr.sgi.com> <20050416234344.GQ19099@pasky.ji.cz> <20050416171009.0bedbab4.pj@sgi.com> <20050418082334.25359013.pj@sgi.com> <20050418183038.GB5554@pasky.ji.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Apr 18 21:15:22 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([12.107.209.244]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DNbhw-0000HY-MT for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Mon, 18 Apr 2005 21:14:56 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262169AbVDRTS4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Apr 2005 15:18:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262170AbVDRTS4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Apr 2005 15:18:56 -0400 Received: from omx2-ext.sgi.com ([192.48.171.19]:32726 "EHLO omx2.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262169AbVDRTSy (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Apr 2005 15:18:54 -0400 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by omx2.sgi.com (8.12.11/8.12.9/linux-outbound_gateway-1.1) with ESMTP id j3IKwQCF015431; Mon, 18 Apr 2005 13:58:36 -0700 Received: from vpn2 (mtv-vpn-hw-pj-2.corp.sgi.com [134.15.25.219]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (SGI-8.12.5/8.12.5) with SMTP id j3IJI0lU15758911; Mon, 18 Apr 2005 12:18:03 -0700 (PDT) To: Petr Baudis In-Reply-To: <20050418183038.GB5554@pasky.ji.cz> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.0 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Pasky wrote: > But what I said still holds - this can go > in only after we have a shell library sharing the common functions Ah - thanks for repeating that - it didn't sink in the first time. Good idea. > Yes, sorry about that; I had a lot of mail traffic lately ... No problem. I hope you're having fun at the center of this cyclone. > I cannot guarantee I will look at it immediately, though. Good. You priorities sound fine to me. I'll rework the patches and send them along again in a few days, when I get a chance. -- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson 1.650.933.1373, 1.925.600.0401