git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>, Petr Baudis <pasky@ucw.cz>
Cc: Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>, Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: Re-done kernel archive - real one?
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 23:16:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050418231652.C16789@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050417195742.D13233@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>; from rmk@arm.linux.org.uk on Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 07:57:42PM +0100

Ok, since the last one was soo successful, and I'm up for more
punishment, here's another attempt.  The diffstat is rather
interesting in this one, claiming no changes.  It should look
like this:

 arch/arm/lib/bitops.h |   33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 files changed, 33 insertions(+)

However, it seems that git diff can't handle new files appearing
yet.

The other interesting thing to note is that patches are generated
for '-p0' rather than '-p1' application, which is contary to our
historical requirements.  This is going to confuse people - can
we make it generate -p1 patches please?

Linus - assuming I un-messed-up my tree properly (it appears to
be correct and fsck-cache $(commit-id) is happy) please merge
this.  Thanks.

Linus,

Please incorporate the latest ARM changes, which can
be found at:

	master.kernel.org:/home/rmk/linux-2.6-rmk.git

This will update the following files:

 0 files changed

through these ChangeSets:

From: Russell King: Mon Apr 18 22:50:01 BST 2005
	
	[PATCH] ARM: Add missing new file for bitops patch
	
	Signed-off-by: Russell King


-- 
Russell King


  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-04-18 22:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-04-16 23:01 Re-done kernel archive - real one? Linus Torvalds
2005-04-17 15:24 ` Russell King
2005-04-17 16:28   ` Petr Baudis
2005-04-17 16:36   ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-17 18:57     ` Russell King
2005-04-17 19:33       ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-17 19:45         ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-17 19:51         ` Russell King
2005-04-17 20:08           ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-17 20:11             ` Russell King
2005-04-17 20:26               ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-17 20:42                 ` Russell King
2005-04-18 22:16       ` Russell King [this message]
2005-04-18 22:33         ` Petr Baudis
2005-04-18 23:29         ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-18 23:53         ` Petr Baudis
2005-04-17 16:05 ` Russell King
2005-04-17 16:44   ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-17 18:13     ` David A. Wheeler
2005-04-17 18:14       ` Petr Baudis
2005-04-17 18:20       ` Russell King
2005-04-17 18:44         ` David A. Wheeler
2005-04-18 11:15         ` Martin Schlemmer
2005-04-17 20:21 ` H. Peter Anvin
2005-04-17 21:50 ` Jochen Roemling
2005-04-17 22:09   ` Randy.Dunlap
2005-04-17 22:30     ` Petr Baudis
2005-04-17 21:52 ` David Woodhouse
2005-04-17 22:17   ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-17 22:19     ` Russell King
2005-04-17 22:51       ` Russell King
2005-04-17 23:24         ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-18  9:23           ` Russell King
2005-04-18 11:14             ` Martin Schlemmer
2005-04-18 11:15             ` Petr Baudis
2005-04-18 15:23             ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-18 17:05               ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-18 18:07                 ` Petr Baudis
2005-04-18 21:53               ` Russell King
2005-04-18 22:01                 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-18 22:48                 ` Petr Baudis
2005-04-18 22:59                   ` Russell King
2005-04-18 23:09                     ` Petr Baudis
2005-04-19  7:27                       ` Russell King
2005-04-18 23:31                   ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-18 21:33             ` Russell King
2005-04-18 21:56               ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-18 14:22           ` Petr Baudis
2005-04-18 15:04           ` Greg KH
2005-04-18 15:25             ` Randy.Dunlap
2005-04-18 15:42             ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-18 22:05               ` Greg KH
2005-04-18 22:14                 ` Greg KH
2005-04-18 23:16                   ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-18 23:26                     ` Greg KH
2005-04-18 23:10                 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-17 22:20     ` H. Peter Anvin
2005-04-17 22:22     ` randy_dunlap
2005-04-17 23:21       ` David Woodhouse
2005-04-18  1:33         ` randy_dunlap

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050418231652.C16789@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
    --to=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=pasky@ucw.cz \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).