From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Russell King Subject: Re: Re-done kernel archive - real one? Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 23:16:52 +0100 Message-ID: <20050418231652.C16789@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20050417162448.A13233@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20050417195742.D13233@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Git Mailing List , Peter Anvin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Apr 19 00:13:16 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([12.107.209.244]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DNeUM-0007pd-2J for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 19 Apr 2005 00:13:06 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261191AbVDRWRB (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Apr 2005 18:17:01 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261192AbVDRWRB (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Apr 2005 18:17:01 -0400 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([212.18.232.186]:16145 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261191AbVDRWQ6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Apr 2005 18:16:58 -0400 Received: from flint.arm.linux.org.uk ([2002:d412:e8ba:1:201:2ff:fe14:8fad]) by caramon.arm.linux.org.uk with asmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.41) id 1DNeY2-000176-BE; Mon, 18 Apr 2005 23:16:54 +0100 Received: from rmk by flint.arm.linux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.41) id 1DNeY1-0005yk-4H; Mon, 18 Apr 2005 23:16:53 +0100 To: Linus Torvalds , Petr Baudis Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20050417195742.D13233@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>; from rmk@arm.linux.org.uk on Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 07:57:42PM +0100 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Ok, since the last one was soo successful, and I'm up for more punishment, here's another attempt. The diffstat is rather interesting in this one, claiming no changes. It should look like this: arch/arm/lib/bitops.h | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 files changed, 33 insertions(+) However, it seems that git diff can't handle new files appearing yet. The other interesting thing to note is that patches are generated for '-p0' rather than '-p1' application, which is contary to our historical requirements. This is going to confuse people - can we make it generate -p1 patches please? Linus - assuming I un-messed-up my tree properly (it appears to be correct and fsck-cache $(commit-id) is happy) please merge this. Thanks. Linus, Please incorporate the latest ARM changes, which can be found at: master.kernel.org:/home/rmk/linux-2.6-rmk.git This will update the following files: 0 files changed through these ChangeSets: From: Russell King: Mon Apr 18 22:50:01 BST 2005 [PATCH] ARM: Add missing new file for bitops patch Signed-off-by: Russell King -- Russell King