From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Petr Baudis Subject: Re: More git pull problems Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 10:23:41 +0200 Message-ID: <20050419082341.GC2393@pasky.ji.cz> References: <20050419080251.A11988@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Git X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Apr 19 10:20:36 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([12.107.209.244]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DNnxW-0007xn-F8 for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 19 Apr 2005 10:19:50 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261407AbVDSIXv (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Apr 2005 04:23:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261410AbVDSIXv (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Apr 2005 04:23:51 -0400 Received: from w241.dkm.cz ([62.24.88.241]:52921 "HELO machine.sinus.cz") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S261407AbVDSIXp (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Apr 2005 04:23:45 -0400 Received: (qmail 4072 invoked by uid 2001); 19 Apr 2005 08:23:41 -0000 To: Russell King Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050419080251.A11988@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-message-flag: Outlook : A program to spread viri, but it can do mail too. Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 09:02:51AM CEST, I got a letter where Russell King told me that... > My automatic pull this morning produced the following messages, which > seem to indicate that something's up with git pull now. > > git-pasky-0.4 (7bef49b5d53218ed3fa8bac291b5515c6479810c) > > > New branch: 945a2562ee9e632bc6b3399fd49e028c39d19023 > > Tracked branch, applying changes... > > Fast-forwarding 945a2562ee9e632bc6b3399fd49e028c39d19023 -> 945a2562ee9e632bc6b3399fd49e028c39d19023 > > on top of 945a2562ee9e632bc6b3399fd49e028c39d19023... > > gitdiff.sh: trying to diff 67607f05a66e36b2f038c77cfb61350d2110f7e8 against itself This means nothing more than you pulled your tracked branch for the first time, but before you already had the latest copy; this wouldn't have happened with subsequent pulls, and it was fixed some time ago - it would be really nice if you could try the new pull and merge. It is harmless anyway. It got confused and tried to do "zero-length fast forward", which git diff complained about, but it couldn't do any harm (I hope). -- Petr "Pasky" Baudis Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/ C++: an octopus made by nailing extra legs onto a dog. -- Steve Taylor