From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: [GIT PATCH] I2C and W1 bugfixes for 2.6.12-rc2 Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 11:58:07 -0700 Message-ID: <20050419185807.GA1191@kroah.com> References: <20050419043938.GA23724@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Linus Torvalds , Git Mailing List , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sensors@stimpy.netroedge.com X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Apr 19 20:55:03 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([12.107.209.244]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DNxrs-00011Y-7w for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 19 Apr 2005 20:54:40 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261628AbVDSS6p (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Apr 2005 14:58:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261594AbVDSS6p (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Apr 2005 14:58:45 -0400 Received: from mail.kroah.org ([69.55.234.183]:38374 "EHLO perch.kroah.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261591AbVDSS6m (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Apr 2005 14:58:42 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.10] (c-24-22-118-199.hsd1.or.comcast.net [24.22.118.199]) (authenticated) by perch.kroah.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j3JIwYi26014; Tue, 19 Apr 2005 11:58:34 -0700 Received: from greg by echidna.kroah.org with local (masqmail 0.2.19) id 1DNxvD-0JY-00; Tue, 19 Apr 2005 11:58:07 -0700 To: Greg KH Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050419043938.GA23724@kroah.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 09:39:38PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > Alright, let's try some small i2c and w1 patches... > > Could you merge with: > kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/i2c-2.6.git/ Nice, it looks like the merge of this tree, and my usb tree worked just fine. So, what does this now mean? Is your kernel.org git tree now going to be the "real" kernel tree that you will be working off of now? Should we crank up the nightly snapshots and emails to the -commits list? Can I rely on the fact that these patches are now in your tree and I can forget about them? :) Just wondering how comfortable you feel with your git tree so far. thanks, greg k-h