From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Joshua T. Corbin" Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.6.2 && heads-up on upcoming changes Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 17:58:18 -0400 Message-ID: <200504201758.18456.jcorbin@wunjo.org> References: <20050420205633.GC19112@pasky.ji.cz> <20050420211919.GA20129@kroah.com> <4266CED2.60806@timesys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Apr 20 23:55:15 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([12.107.209.244]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DON9g-0004LE-O2 for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2005 23:54:45 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261827AbVDTV6k (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Apr 2005 17:58:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261831AbVDTV6k (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Apr 2005 17:58:40 -0400 Received: from node1.wunjo.org ([64.62.190.230]:55977 "EHLO node1.wunjo.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261827AbVDTV62 (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Apr 2005 17:58:28 -0400 Received: by node1.wunjo.org (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 7239742EDD; Wed, 20 Apr 2005 17:58:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.1.114] (ctt186167.ceinetworks.com [216.169.186.167]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by node1.wunjo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8635842BA0 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2005 17:58:21 -0400 (EDT) To: git@vger.kernel.org User-Agent: KMail/1.8 In-Reply-To: <4266CED2.60806@timesys.com> Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on node1 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=ham version=3.0.2 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On 20 April 2005 17:51, Mike Taht wrote: > I keep thinking perversely that we need something as obtuse as possible > in the unix tradition, but easy to type... git requires that the fingers > move off the home row... > > how about "asdf" or "jkl"? :) > > cg is singularly uncomfortable to type. I think that's why it isn't > commonly used..... Hmm...got to disagree, cg is perfectly comfortable to type here on my dvorak, whilst asdf ad jkl are uncomfortable deviations accross the board ;-) -- Regards, Joshua T. Corbin