From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Joshua T. Corbin" Subject: Re: [PATCH] git-pasky debian dir Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 14:00:11 -0400 Message-ID: <200504221400.11507.jcorbin@wunjo.org> References: <200504220918.06977.jcorbin@wunjo.org> <20050422161635.GA5324@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Apr 22 19:56:27 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([12.107.209.244]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DP2Nj-0000iY-6a for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Fri, 22 Apr 2005 19:55:59 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262096AbVDVSA1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Apr 2005 14:00:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262098AbVDVSA1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Apr 2005 14:00:27 -0400 Received: from smtp1.losch.net ([66.212.32.3]:19168 "HELO smtp1.losch.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S262096AbVDVSAR (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Apr 2005 14:00:17 -0400 Received: (qmail 19104 invoked by uid 102); 22 Apr 2005 18:00:17 -0000 Received: from 66.212.35.47 by smtp1 (envelope-from , uid 71) with qmail-scanner-1.24 (clamdscan: 0.80/848. Clear:RC:1(66.212.35.47):. Processed in 0.023391 secs); 22 Apr 2005 18:00:17 -0000 Received: from office.losch.net (66.212.35.47) by smtp1.losch.net with SMTP; 22 Apr 2005 18:00:17 -0000 To: Chris Wright User-Agent: KMail/1.8 In-Reply-To: <20050422161635.GA5324@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On 22 April 2005 12:16, Chris Wright wrote: > This whole bit should be formalized. Agreed, hence why I did it as a package-build-time patch instead of changing directly in my repository. > Ideally, I'd like to do /usr/bin/git frontend, with all scripts > in /usr/libexec/git/. How standard is this '/usr/libexec'? I have no such directory on my Debian boxes. If /usr/share rubs you the wroung way, what of simply /usr/lib/git-pasky? > However, this requires something more than hardcoding paths. Definately, and it may not play well with the simpler method of installing to $HOME/bin. This was just a quick hack as not to pollute /usr/bin with files that aren't directly executed by the user. > You get the idea ;-) I certainly see how it makes sense for a first > run to get it going. But this will need fixing upstream. This will all be moot when cogito goes the way of cg-* ;-) Cheers, Josh -- Regards, Joshua T. Corbin