From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: Mercurial 0.3 vs git benchmarks Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 13:56:06 -0700 Message-ID: <20050426135606.7b21a2e2.akpm@osdl.org> References: <20050426004111.GI21897@waste.org> <200504260713.26020.mason@suse.com> <200504261138.46339.mason@suse.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: mason@suse.com, torvalds@osdl.org, mike.taht@timesys.com, mpm@selenic.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Apr 26 22:57:01 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([12.107.209.244]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DQX75-0006o1-Bo for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 22:57:00 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261782AbVDZVCH (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Apr 2005 17:02:07 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261777AbVDZVCH (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Apr 2005 17:02:07 -0400 Received: from fire.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:20165 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261776AbVDZVCD (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Apr 2005 17:02:03 -0400 Received: from shell0.pdx.osdl.net (fw.osdl.org [65.172.181.6]) by smtp.osdl.org (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j3QKuSs4025605 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 26 Apr 2005 13:56:28 -0700 Received: from bix (shell0.pdx.osdl.net [10.9.0.31]) by shell0.pdx.osdl.net (8.13.1/8.11.6) with SMTP id j3QKuQBV008408; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 13:56:26 -0700 To: Magnus Damm In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.0 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-vine-linux-gnu) X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0 required=5 tests= X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63-osdl_revision__1.35__ X-MIMEDefang-Filter: osdl$Revision: 1.109 $ X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.36 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Magnus Damm wrote: > > My primitive guess is that it was because > the ext3 journal became full. The default ext3 journal size is inappropriately small, btw. Normally you should manually make it 128M or so, rather than 32M. Unless you have a small amount of memory and/or a large number of filesystems, in which case there might be problems with pinned memory. Mounting as ext2 is a useful technique for determining whether the fs is getting in the way.