From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: Mercurial 0.3 vs git benchmarks Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 15:56:09 -0700 Message-ID: <20050426155609.06e3ddcf.akpm@osdl.org> References: <20050426004111.GI21897@waste.org> <200504260713.26020.mason@suse.com> <200504261138.46339.mason@suse.com> <20050426135606.7b21a2e2.akpm@osdl.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: magnus.damm@gmail.com, mason@suse.com, mike.taht@timesys.com, mpm@selenic.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Apr 27 00:51:11 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([12.107.209.244]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DQYtF-00065Z-WC for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 00:50:50 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261808AbVDZWz5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Apr 2005 18:55:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261834AbVDZWz5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Apr 2005 18:55:57 -0400 Received: from fire.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:18400 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261808AbVDZWzt (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Apr 2005 18:55:49 -0400 Received: from shell0.pdx.osdl.net (fw.osdl.org [65.172.181.6]) by smtp.osdl.org (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j3QMtes4002324 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 26 Apr 2005 15:55:41 -0700 Received: from localhost.localdomain (shell0.pdx.osdl.net [10.9.0.31]) by shell0.pdx.osdl.net (8.13.1/8.11.6) with SMTP id j3QMtdr5015877; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 15:55:39 -0700 To: Linus Torvalds In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.0 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-vine-linux-gnu) X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0 required=5 tests= X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63-osdl_revision__1.35__ X-MIMEDefang-Filter: osdl$Revision: 1.109 $ X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.36 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > On Tue, 26 Apr 2005, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > Mounting as ext2 is a useful technique for determining whether the fs is > > getting in the way. > > What's the preferred way to try to convert a root filesystem to a bigger > journal? Forcing "rootfstype=ext2" at boot and boot into single-user, and > then the appropriate magic tune2fs? Or what? > Gee, it's been ages. umm, - umount the fs - tune2fs -O ^has_journal /dev/whatever - fsck -fy (to clean up the now-orphaned journal inode) - tune2fs -j -J size=nblocks (normally 4k blocks) - mount the fs