From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Glanzmann Subject: Re: Mercurial 0.3 vs git benchmarks Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 21:01:44 +0200 Message-ID: <20050427190144.GA28848@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> References: <200504261138.46339.mason@suse.com> <20050426135606.7b21a2e2.akpm@osdl.org> <20050426155609.06e3ddcf.akpm@osdl.org> <426ED20B.9070706@zytor.com> <871x8wb6w4.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> <20050427151357.GH1087@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <426FDFCD.6000309@zytor.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Florian Weimer , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , magnus.damm@gmail.com, mason@suse.com, mike.taht@timesys.com, mpm@selenic.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Apr 27 20:59:09 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([12.107.209.244]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DQrj9-0007nl-8w for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 20:57:39 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261961AbVD0TC2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Apr 2005 15:02:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261962AbVD0TC2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Apr 2005 15:02:28 -0400 Received: from faui03.informatik.uni-erlangen.de ([131.188.30.103]:59094 "EHLO faui03.informatik.uni-erlangen.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261961AbVD0TCO (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Apr 2005 15:02:14 -0400 Received: from faui03.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui03.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [131.188.30.103]) by faui03.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j3RJ1jS8007136 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 27 Apr 2005 19:01:45 GMT Received: (from sithglan@localhost) by faui03.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (8.12.9/8.12.9) id j3RJ1ixM007135; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 21:01:44 +0200 (CEST) To: "H. Peter Anvin" Mail-Followup-To: "H. Peter Anvin" , Florian Weimer , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , magnus.damm@gmail.com, mason@suse.com, mike.taht@timesys.com, mpm@selenic.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, git@vger.kernel.org Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <426FDFCD.6000309@zytor.com> X-URL: http://wwwcip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/~sithglan/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Hello, > Directory hashing slows down operations that do linear sweeps through > the filesystem reading every single file, simply because without > dir_index, there is likely to be a correlation between inode order and > directory order, whereas with dir_index, readdir() returns entries in > hash order. thank you for the awareness training. Than mutt should be slower, too. Maybe I should repeat that tests. Thomas