From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Theodore Ts'o Subject: Re: Mercurial 0.3 vs git benchmarks Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 15:55:54 -0400 Message-ID: <20050427195554.GA7793@thunk.org> References: <20050426004111.GI21897@waste.org> <200504260713.26020.mason@suse.com> <200504261138.46339.mason@suse.com> <20050426135606.7b21a2e2.akpm@osdl.org> <20050426155609.06e3ddcf.akpm@osdl.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Linus Torvalds , magnus.damm@gmail.com, mason@suse.com, mike.taht@timesys.com, mpm@selenic.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Apr 27 21:51:13 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([12.107.209.244]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DQsYl-0007sh-WC for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 21:51:00 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261987AbVD0T4R (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Apr 2005 15:56:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261986AbVD0T4R (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Apr 2005 15:56:17 -0400 Received: from thunk.org ([69.25.196.29]:25270 "EHLO thunker.thunk.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261984AbVD0T4O (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Apr 2005 15:56:14 -0400 Received: from root (helo=thunk.org) by thunker.thunk.org with local-esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1DQsda-0000qP-00; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 15:55:58 -0400 Received: from tytso by thunk.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DQsdW-00023e-CA; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 15:55:54 -0400 To: Andrew Morton Mail-Followup-To: Theodore Ts'o , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , magnus.damm@gmail.com, mason@suse.com, mike.taht@timesys.com, mpm@selenic.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, git@vger.kernel.org Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050426155609.06e3ddcf.akpm@osdl.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 03:56:09PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > - umount the fs > - tune2fs -O ^has_journal /dev/whatever > - fsck -fy (to clean up the now-orphaned journal inode) Using moderately recent versions of e2fsprogs, tune2fs will clean up the journal inode, so there's no reason to do an fsck. (Harmless, but it shouldn't be necessary and it takes time). > - tune2fs -j -J size=nblocks (normally 4k blocks) The argument to "-J size" is in megabytes, not in blocks. - Ted