From: Chris Mason <mason@suse.com>
To: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Finding file revisions
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 18:27:54 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200504281827.54553.mason@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1114723987.4212.51.camel@localhost.localdomain>
On Thursday 28 April 2005 17:33, Kay Sievers wrote:
> Sure. But file-changes lists the commit:
> c79bea07ec4d3ef087962699fe8b2f6dc5ca7754
>
> when asked for:
> "drivers/usb/core/usb.c"
>
> and that file isn't touched there. Actually it lists merge-commits which
> are not related to the file.
Ok, this is what Daniel and David were talking about. When we've got commit
with multiple parents, we'll find the file at least one more time than it was
really changed. Looking at the results on git web, it's easy it ignore the
merge sets as noise, but it would be nice if we only printed the merge set
when it made some change to the file the original cset being merged did not.
I had misread your first mail, thinking that you had developed this
independently and solved these issues ;) The problem is that if we do a true
depth first search, it seems like we'll have to keep a potentially unbounded
amount of data in order to find the first changeset that happened to create a
given sha1. I'd really rather print the mergeset and let the user figure it
out.
But, we're not really printing a merge set so much as we're printing the
complete diff of what was merged. Is there some way to see what changes had
to be done in order to resolve conflicts during a merge?
-chris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-28 22:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-04-27 16:50 Finding file revisions Chris Mason
2005-04-27 17:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-27 18:23 ` Chris Mason
2005-04-27 22:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-27 22:31 ` Chris Mason
2005-04-28 8:41 ` Simon Fowler
2005-04-28 11:56 ` Chris Mason
2005-04-28 13:13 ` Simon Fowler
2005-04-28 11:45 ` Chris Mason
2005-04-28 16:34 ` Kay Sievers
2005-04-28 17:10 ` Tony Luck
2005-04-28 17:22 ` Thomas Glanzmann
2005-04-28 19:11 ` Kay Sievers
2005-04-28 20:58 ` Chris Mason
2005-04-28 21:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-28 21:33 ` Kay Sievers
2005-04-28 21:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-28 22:27 ` Chris Mason [this message]
2005-04-28 13:09 ` David Woodhouse
2005-04-28 13:01 ` David Woodhouse
2005-04-27 18:41 ` Thomas Gleixner
2005-04-28 15:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-28 16:47 ` Thomas Gleixner
2005-04-28 16:08 ` Daniel Barkalow
2005-04-28 17:05 ` Chris Mason
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200504281827.54553.mason@suse.com \
--to=mason@suse.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).