From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tom Lord Subject: Re: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 12:54:19 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <200504291954.MAA27561@emf.net> References: <20050429194753.GA14222@uglybox.localnet> Cc: seanlkml@sympatico.ca, git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Apr 29 21:49:37 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([12.107.209.244]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DRbU4-0002uw-VT for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2005 21:49:09 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262917AbVD2TyZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Apr 2005 15:54:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262918AbVD2TyZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Apr 2005 15:54:25 -0400 Received: from emf.emf.net ([205.149.0.19]:55817 "EHLO emf.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262917AbVD2TyV (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Apr 2005 15:54:21 -0400 Received: (from lord@localhost) by emf.net (K/K) id MAA27561; Fri, 29 Apr 2005 12:54:19 -0700 (PDT) To: noel@zhtwn.com In-reply-to: <20050429194753.GA14222@uglybox.localnet> (message from Noel Maddy on Fri, 29 Apr 2005 15:47:53 -0400) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org > Call me a naive git, but seems to me the "git way" is a little > different. It's tree-based rather than diff-based, and doesn't involve > passing diffs around, right? Isn't that a significant part of what I said? Go back and read more carefully, is my suggestion. > Or am I missing something? Very much so. -t