From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sam Ravnborg Subject: Re: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark Date: Mon, 2 May 2005 22:54:18 +0200 Message-ID: <20050502205418.GA12409@mars.ravnborg.org> References: <20050430025211.GP17379@opteron.random> <42764C0C.8030604@tmr.com> <20050502171802.GA28045@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon May 02 22:52:01 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([12.107.209.244]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DShs6-0006Hp-PR for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Mon, 02 May 2005 22:50:31 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261774AbVEBUzj (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 May 2005 16:55:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261773AbVEBUzj (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 May 2005 16:55:39 -0400 Received: from pfepb.post.tele.dk ([195.41.46.236]:7448 "EHLO pfepb.post.tele.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261745AbVEBUxG (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 May 2005 16:53:06 -0400 Received: from mars.ravnborg.org (0x50a0757d.hrnxx9.adsl-dhcp.tele.dk [80.160.117.125]) by pfepb.post.tele.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E86C5EE023; Mon, 2 May 2005 22:53:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mars.ravnborg.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BABA96AC01D; Mon, 2 May 2005 22:54:18 +0200 (CEST) To: Linus Torvalds , Bill Davidsen , Andrea Arcangeli , Matt Mackall , linux-kernel , git@vger.kernel.org Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050502171802.GA28045@nevyn.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 01:18:02PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > #!/bin/sh > > exec perl perlscript.pl "$@" > > > > instead. > > Do you know any vaguely Unix-like system where #!/usr/bin/env does not > work? I don't; I've used it on Solaris, HP-UX, OSF/1... I had to pull out a call to env from kbuild due to strange errors in some mandrake? based system. I never tracked it down fully at that time, I just realised that two different programs named env was present, and the less common one made the linux kernel build fail. env was not called with any path in that example so that may have cured it. Sam